my guess is because it bounced off the camera and came back to the ice.

maybe should have been considered out of play when it touched the camera. it certainly would've been called out of play if it bounced off the camera and into the seats

everyone gave hayton a nice hard slap on the left shoulder during handshakes

The rule interpretation was that the camera was an "object" out of the ice just like the jumabtron, therefore if it's hit it's just a stoppage, not a penalty. So not like they made things up out of thin air.

need to make new rules for the stupid camera

basically this, the camera itself was placed just outside of the glass

was more a misread rule, but you never know if Russia would have scored regardless

would it have been a delay of game penalty?

cuz if so, it goes out of play before it hits the camera, right?

Yeah I was just saying Canada could have stopped the 5 on 3

i didnt watch it so i dont know the situation, guess i should go look at a recap

it was a bad call, but you never know how Canada would have played 5 on 3, and would Russia have tried 6 on 3?