Quote (fazyluck @ Feb 28 2017 11:44am)
i don't know that anyone would be willing to give up a top 6 C for 22 games and a playoff run.
seems like a future trade, and it seems like shatty sorta handcuffed Army into making something happen but only within his strict limits.
either way, the press conference was interesting.
i don't think army needs to be fired nor do i think he deserves all the heat he's catching for this trade. shatty wasn't going to play here next year no matter what, because he wants responsibility that parayko/petro are taking and he just won't get that.
better to get something as far as picks and prospects (albeit a non-producing prospect, a prospect nonetheless) than to just watch him walk with nothing in return.
i wouldn't call this a failure or an issue by any means. put in a tough place, made something happen.
no i agree we werent gonna get a current top 6 center for a rental shattenkirk. but i assume he couldve maybe at least gotten a better center prospect than a guy whos ceiling is probably 3rd line center (which we have enough 3rd line centers) and a late first in the worst draft in a while.
if we were going to move shattenkirk no matter what, it needed to be done in the offseason. we lost so much value because trading him at the TDL really limited the teams interested.
and shattenkirk didnt handcuff armstrong. armstrong handcuffed armstrong by ONLY looking for a sign and trade for the past year, when clearly that wasnt going to happen.
the tough place he was put in, thats because he put himself there.
honestly, burrows returned almost as much as shatty, thats fucking pathetic.
and hanzal returned more.
This post was edited by Genetics on Feb 28 2017 10:53am