https://www.iltalehti.fi/kotimaa/a/8a230cf8-ce20-40e6-92c8-5d4938b46d0f?fbclid=IwAR03xGMAYINSMg-x8OqgmntaAKktXWDgHitN0Rxo6YDFrx_0JN8nqUoQswAfinland
The owner of the cafe in Vihd woke up with his wife on the eve of Christmas Eve in 2016 on a cellphone abort alert.
They both left their own cars. The woman called the emergency center on the way.
Having reached the spot, the cafe owner drove back to the middle of the yard. When he left the car, he took the shotgun into his armpit.
The cafe owner met in the yard with a man with a crow in his hand. He told the man to drop the parrot and sit on the covered terrace. He let the man drop the iron out of his hand and tell his name and the route from which he had broken. In addition, the man was told that there are two more inside the cafeteria.
Inside, movement was visible
The owner of the cafe had found inside the shop and saw a person jumping from the window in the porch. The owner of the cafe had been crying after the person leaving the run, but this did not stop.
The owner of the café said that he had caught a warning shot by the shotgun in the air. The owner of the cafe owner had left behind the fleet by another car. When he was escaping, the man had to stay under the van.
The third person's escape from the cafe owner did not notice.
The owner of the cafe had said the first bomber he had seen first sitting down to the table. He had also mentioned that he had a pamphlet and a dog in the car, but he denied actually being killed by a firing or anything else. He said he had used a light lead in the shotgun.
The police ordered a shotgun
The police had come in and left their car at the entrance door. The police had told the cafe owner to calculate the shotgun, but he did not do it right now because, according to his own words, he saw the outbreak of a burglar.
However, the crumbling crude claimed that the owner of the cafe was threatened with firing.
According to the prosecutor, a trapped in a thief had a legitimate reason to fear that personal security would be in serious danger. In addition, the prosecutor found that the café owner had caused a shot by shooting at two burglars.
The theft was designed to steal money from the cafe, but they only took money and alcohol and energy drinks, as no money was found.
The café owner was convicted
The District Court held that although the owner of the cafeteria intended to defend his property, his conduct was not defensible.
The owner of the café was sentenced to an unlawful threat and a risk of causing a fine of 100 days in the District Court of West Uusimaa for a fine of 1100 euros. In addition, he was sentenced to forfeiture of a criminal instrument or a shotgun.
He was also ordered to pay a single theft of EUR 1,000 for reparations for compensation and another for EUR 700 for compensation. Furthermore, he was ordered to pay half of the remuneration of each of the three thieves. The sums were about 700-1000 euros for each reward.This post was edited by do_NaUKI on Nov 17 2018 09:15pm