Our first like 4-5 years were horrid lol

yeah you were an expansion team so its expected

but still 14 out of 20 is good for an expansion team. as much as i hate the sens i'd definitely rank them above the habs for this season

how can you not?sens were like top 4 in the east til injuries came
they were winnig games but definately slid and still only finished 4 wins behind the habs with the injuries
sure they lost alfy but added bobby ryan and macarthur ...habs added briere who if plays like last season will prob get benched

This post was edited by dragoneth on Aug 19 2013 01:54pm

Sens
Nucks
Habs
Leafs
cOilers
Jets











Flames

Someone else voted Flames!

yeesssssss

florida made SCF 3 years after they were created. blues made it super quick too, even if the format was different.



do you really believe that anderson will be as good as he was this year again? the year before with a healthy karlsson, they were bottom in GAA: this year they were in the top of GAA

i don't think its a coincidence.
'


philly missed 9 out of 45 times.

This post was edited by dej on Aug 19 2013 05:14pm

anybody that puts habs > sens are retarded. How do you lose 4-1 in the playoffs and get the number 1 ranked spot? It's like a professional fight, the winner is always ranked above the loser. This most def applies to playoff hockey, especially when it was an absolute massacre.

you can lose even if you're the better team

was the '06(?) canes better than every othe team? was '96 panthers? every other team that was riding a hot goaltender? was the leafs the 4th best team in the NHL last year after detroit, chicago and boston because they brought boston to game7?

you can't base everything from one playoff series or run. senators got swept (? or was it 4-1) the next series anyway, so its not like they won the stanley cup

why not? out of 3 years as a sen hes proven hes good enough to stick around as their #1 his worst season is a .914 sv% with the others like .93*and .94*
and if he does for some reason flop its not like lehner is shit hes looked pretty good in the games hes gotten
bishop wasnt that bad either but they traded him becasue they trust in anderson+ lehner... and i dont really see a reason to not either

This post was edited by dragoneth on Aug 19 2013 05:29pm

every time anderson played a full year as a starter, his save % have been high .910s. actually, they've been .914 and .917. I see no raeson for Anderson to be considered an elit starter since he have never had good stats being a starter for a full season