d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Hockey > New! Official Off-topic Off-hockey Thread
Prev1140514061407140814092972Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 28,247
Joined: May 27 2009
Gold: 18,101.00
Apr 25 2018 02:54pm
Quote (Subzer0isGG @ Apr 25 2018 05:01am)
Gurgle salt water in your mouth.
It’s in pain cause the enamel has rotted away exposing your nerves. Same thing happened to me like 3 years ago. Was an impressive looking tooth they pulled out. Roots were 1inch long and half the wisdom was just dissolved showing the nerves of the tooth which are sensitive.
Good luck.


Damn that is brutal. Guess I better get on it right away.
Quote (dragoneth @ Apr 25 2018 07:51am)
get that shit out that feeling in your cheek/ear could be infection building up which if spreads to your brain can be pretty serious
like did the exact same thing and they gave me antibiotics for infection and it made the pain go away but if u keep the tooth in it comes back
and i left my tooth in so long with a cavity it aqctually spread to another tooth and cost me extra $$ because i needed a specialist to take out my wisdom teeth


Wow..... Well I am scared now. Got an appointment tomorrow.
Quote (Meatstick @ Apr 25 2018 07:29am)
Yeah man no point waiting just get them out. Mine caused pressure and caused problems with the molar beside it.

I'm actually getting a root canal on that molar today lol :( hope it's not too painful.


Good luck. Let me know how it goes. I think this tooth is beyond saving I just want it gone. Still confused as to how it even happened. All of my other teeth are in good condition.
Member
Posts: 63,625
Joined: Sep 27 2007
Gold: 103.00
Apr 25 2018 02:56pm
Quote (Meatstick @ Apr 25 2018 09:29am)
Yeah man no point waiting just get them out. Mine caused pressure and caused problems with the molar beside it.

I'm actually getting a root canal on that molar today lol :( hope it's not too painful.


RIP meatstick

he never came back :(
Member
Posts: 60,946
Joined: Jun 28 2007
Gold: 77,663.29
Apr 25 2018 03:15pm
more psn friends pls
Member
Posts: 28,247
Joined: May 27 2009
Gold: 18,101.00
Apr 25 2018 03:17pm
Quote (Nearin @ Apr 25 2018 12:35pm)
Ya i just hate the concept that we tax labour gains higher than capital gains, I am of the philosphy that $1 is $1 regardless of where it comes from.

By lowering the tax rate on capital gains we are saying that those who work for a living pay 100% of the tax rate, where as those who invest (the rich) pay a lower tax rate on that portion of income. (obviously their $'s paid in tax is still higher)

the philosophy is to incentivize investment over hoarding cash in savings but the result is favorable taxation for the rich.

This is why the ultra rich take much lower salaries and pay themselves as cash disbursements for preferred class shares, and using option plans etc.

e/ this actually punishes the upper middle class the most, those who work for a great living earning them a high tax bracket but still make the majority of their income from labour capital



Compound interest is the greatest force in the universe. Nevermind tax brackets, exemptions etc etc..... These are all just subservient to compound interest.

One man can work his ass of just to scrape by while another can sit on his fat ass and wake up with more money in his account then the working man could ever imagine.

I picture a civic in a race with a Ferrari. No matter how hard the civic pushes itself the Ferrari will lap it 10 fold without breaking a sweat.

That is the difference between the rich and the poor.

It is the sole reason why I am a cheap/frugal person who invests every spare cent I have. As you said investment favors the rich for obvious reasons. The more money you have the easier it is to accumulate more money at an ever increasing rate.

There is no question the current system of capitalism will always serve the wealthy, no matter what changes are argued over. All you can do is not by into the game of buying stupid shit to impress people while you rack up debt you will never be able to pay off.

The majority will unfortunately never have a significant amount of money to invest so they will never be able to break out of the cycle of paycheque to paycheque living. In order for the current system to work the majority need to be permanently trapped in this cycle imo.

One thing I learned after being irresponsible with money for a couple years when I first started working was you can spend $100 now or guarantee yourself $200 in 10 years or $1600 in 40 years, minus inflation. I save money now so I can increase my buying power in the future when I have a better idea of what it is I truly want.

This post was edited by Killingyouall on Apr 25 2018 03:19pm
Member
Posts: 26,437
Joined: Jan 20 2013
Gold: 982.86
Apr 25 2018 03:36pm
Quote (partank @ Apr 25 2018 05:15pm)
more psn friends pls



Nearin1 or nearin2 or aomething ill check at some point
Member
Posts: 26,437
Joined: Jan 20 2013
Gold: 982.86
Apr 25 2018 03:40pm
Quote (Killingyouall @ Apr 25 2018 05:17pm)
Compound interest is the greatest force in the universe. Nevermind tax brackets, exemptions etc etc..... These are all just subservient to compound interest.

One man can work his ass of just to scrape by while another can sit on his fat ass and wake up with more money in his account then the working man could ever imagine.

I picture a civic in a race with a Ferrari. No matter how hard the civic pushes itself the Ferrari will lap it 10 fold without breaking a sweat.

That is the difference between the rich and the poor.

It is the sole reason why I am a cheap/frugal person who invests every spare cent I have. As you said investment favors the rich for obvious reasons. The more money you have the easier it is to accumulate more money at an ever increasing rate.

There is no question the current system of capitalism will always serve the wealthy, no matter what changes are argued over. All you can do is not by into the game of buying stupid shit to impress people while you rack up debt you will never be able to pay off.

The majority will unfortunately never have a significant amount of money to invest so they will never be able to break out of the cycle of paycheque to paycheque living. In order for the current system to work the majority need to be permanently trapped in this cycle imo.

One thing I learned after being irresponsible with money for a couple years when I first started working was you can spend $100 now or guarantee yourself $200 in 10 years or $1600 in 40 years, minus inflation. I save money now so I can increase my buying power in the future when I have a better idea of what it is I truly want.



Absolutely agree, i hardly spend anything and invest it all, im trying to join the capitalists since the system isnt going anywhere.

However i still think the current cap system that has cap gains taxed at 50% of labour income silly.
Member
Posts: 60,946
Joined: Jun 28 2007
Gold: 77,663.29
Apr 25 2018 04:08pm
god i am fucking bad at fortnite lmao

too used to hitting triangle to switch weapons
Member
Posts: 12,361
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Gold: 1,500.00
Apr 25 2018 04:20pm
u guys do know that u get taxed for ur business then whatever money u make as salary as ceo gets taxed as well

it's not like u paid tax as a corporation and then all of a sudden all of ur c-level guys go home with no tax

btw the comment that buffett made about getting taxed less than his secretary isn't 100% true

here's a little snippet:

Warren Buffett created a new tax metric by combining individual income taxes and payroll taxes into one “federal tax rate.” He then asserted that his 2010 “federal tax rate” of 17.4 percent was 18.6 percentage points lower than the 36.0 percent average “federal tax rate” paid by his office workers.

The Social Security and Medicare taxing mechanisms in place in 2010 were inherently fair. Ascribing a “federal tax rate” differential to employee-paid payroll taxes, as Buffett did, is analytically incorrect. This 7.65 percentage point “federal tax rate” differential is a mirage.

Incredibly, Buffett included employer-paid (matching) payroll taxes in his calculations as well, thus doubling the 7.65 percentage point differential.
Buffett ignored, in his calculations, the roughly $1.6 billion in corporate income taxes he bore in 2010 as a one-third owner of Berkshire Hathaway. He also ignored his share (roughly $400 million) of
Social Security and Medicare matching taxes that Berkshire Hathaway paid to employees.

The analytically correct comparison, excluding individual payroll taxes and including corporate income and payroll taxes, shows that Buffett’s “federal tax rate” was actually over 10 percentage points higher than the average rate of his office workers in 2010.

full read here: https://fee.org/articles/5-warren-buffetts-federal-tax-rate-is-less-than-his-secretarys/
Member
Posts: 33,312
Joined: Mar 11 2008
Gold: 4,870.00
Apr 25 2018 04:23pm
Quote (badasses @ Apr 25 2018 04:20pm)
u guys do know that u get taxed for ur business then whatever money u make as salary as ceo gets taxed as well

it's not like u paid tax as a corporation and then all of a sudden all of ur c-level guys go home with no tax

btw the comment that buffett made about getting taxed less than his secretary isn't 100% true

here's a little snippet:

Warren Buffett created a new tax metric by combining individual income taxes and payroll taxes into one “federal tax rate.” He then asserted that his 2010 “federal tax rate” of 17.4 percent was 18.6 percentage points lower than the 36.0 percent average “federal tax rate” paid by his office workers.

The Social Security and Medicare taxing mechanisms in place in 2010 were inherently fair. Ascribing a “federal tax rate” differential to employee-paid payroll taxes, as Buffett did, is analytically incorrect. This 7.65 percentage point “federal tax rate” differential is a mirage.

Incredibly, Buffett included employer-paid (matching) payroll taxes in his calculations as well, thus doubling the 7.65 percentage point differential.
Buffett ignored, in his calculations, the roughly $1.6 billion in corporate income taxes he bore in 2010 as a one-third owner of Berkshire Hathaway. He also ignored his share (roughly $400 million) of
Social Security and Medicare matching taxes that Berkshire Hathaway paid to employees.

The analytically correct comparison, excluding individual payroll taxes and including corporate income and payroll taxes, shows that Buffett’s “federal tax rate” was actually over 10 percentage points higher than the average rate of his office workers in 2010.

full read here: https://fee.org/articles/5-warren-buffetts-federal-tax-rate-is-less-than-his-secretarys/



Interesting. But all the masses hear is “warren buffet taxed less than his secretary”

This post was edited by Subzer0isGG on Apr 25 2018 04:46pm
Member
Posts: 21,735
Joined: Dec 14 2007
Gold: 423.69
Go Back To Hockey Topic List
Prev1140514061407140814092972Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll