whats your alternative?

having 1-3 list runners like in past or giving every active a vote?

but I has a woman. and I'm a teacher, so I won't ever get the money :sad:

now i see why list is so important

you need all the power!!!

power hungry mongrel!

he left like 3 hour ago? before that, he was online hours here and did 10+ long post here but couldnt find 30 second to answer me.
but anyway w/eeeeeeveeeeeer

if there is something you need an answer to, as I have said I can help as well.

jbone is not master of all things.

I don't have an alternative, there's far too many things yet to be discussed about this subject.

Once we've talked about it enough I imagine we could come up with some improvements to our system


I'd also like to point out, that I in no way feel this needs to change. However there are people out there who would like an honest discussion about changing the system.

tbh the system was just changed to what we have now

the meds votes have always been taken into account, but it has never been done in a way where all the meds have an equal vote like what we did

i honestly think that all the meds deserve to be where they are as decision makers, sure every med has people who don't like them, and it varies per med, but i think a majority of the forums trusts each and every med

i would not be opposed to adding to the med list though and increasing the number of people involved in these discussions

u one of the best meds imo

I appreciate that.

Though, I have made mistakes myself in the past, can think of one recently.
But I try to own up to my mistakes, fix them, and not commit them again.

Pretty sure everyone that is currently on the med/trusted list things the same way as I do in these terms.