d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Hockey > Official Rumor Thread > Trades/draft Day/ufas
Prev1111711181119112011211445Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 18,496
Joined: Jun 25 2009
Gold: 238,300.01
Jun 28 2019 02:06pm
Quote (Secksii @ Jun 28 2019 11:46am)
(Eriksson Watch) Ottawa has to spend about $11.7M to hit the cap floor. They might become the first team in the cap era forced to spend assets to take on a dead contract

unless he calls Benning, might not even have to pay anything


Vegas and toronto must have a boner hearing that toronto needs to take salaries to hit cap floor atm
Member
Posts: 60,946
Joined: Jun 28 2007
Gold: 76,283.29
Jun 28 2019 02:20pm
Quote (Secksii @ Jun 28 2019 12:46pm)
(Eriksson Watch) Ottawa has to spend about $11.7M to hit the cap floor. They might become the first team in the cap era forced to spend assets to take on a dead contract

unless he calls Benning, might not even have to pay anything


or they just pay couple rando UFAs huge money for 1 year.
Member
Posts: 14,319
Joined: Jun 19 2010
Gold: 7,271.48
Jun 28 2019 02:21pm
Quote (Nihility @ Jun 28 2019 02:06pm)
Vegas and toronto must have a boner hearing that toronto needs to take salaries to hit cap floor atm



I can’t see Ottawa being interested in long term contracts so Toronto ( zaitsev) is out. Not sure who Vegas wants to move but I imagine there’s a deal to be made there, Cody Eakins maybe?
Member
Posts: 27,782
Joined: Dec 19 2011
Gold: 3,012.50
Jun 28 2019 02:28pm
Quote (partank @ 28 Jun 2019 13:20)
or they just pay couple rando UFAs huge money for 1 year.


not sure if you're trolling or just don't understand why melynk would get a boner over eriksson's contract.

melynk only needs to pay 5m TOTAL of his money over 3 years for eriksson with 6mil caphit each year.
vs
signing couple rando's for 1 yr for 6m each = 12mil. for 1 year.

which option do you think he will get a boner from his cheapness?

Member
Posts: 60,946
Joined: Jun 28 2007
Gold: 76,283.29
Jun 28 2019 02:34pm
Quote (Secksii @ Jun 28 2019 04:28pm)
not sure if you're trolling or just don't understand why melynk would get a boner over eriksson's contract.

melynk only needs to pay 5m TOTAL of his money over 3 years for eriksson with 6mil caphit each year.
vs
signing couple rando's for 1 yr for 6m each = 12mil. for 1 year.

which option do you think he will get a boner from his cheapness?


but you say their forced to spend assests lol. they wont spend assets to get eriksson
Member
Posts: 19,003
Joined: Jan 27 2007
Gold: 0.10
Jun 28 2019 02:34pm
Quote (remco6 @ Jun 28 2019 02:21pm)
I can’t see Ottawa being interested in long term contracts so Toronto ( zaitsev) is out. Not sure who Vegas wants to move but I imagine there’s a deal to be made there, Cody Eakins maybe?


I heard couple rumors on stastny. Also one on patches that I didn't really believe. Also Colin miller

This post was edited by Chadzle on Jun 28 2019 02:36pm
Member
Posts: 27,782
Joined: Dec 19 2011
Gold: 3,012.50
Jun 28 2019 02:39pm
Quote (partank @ 28 Jun 2019 13:34)
but you say their forced to spend assests lol. they wont spend assets to get eriksson


i didnt say it, it was reported as that.
Also it would make sense for melynk to spend assets to reach cap floor if he's not willing to pay $$$$.
Idk how hard this concept is hard to understand... it's not a game lol it's a business... Melynk constantly loses money, doesn't want to spend money, and his solution is to spend more money each year to reach the cap floor every year?? lmao
Member
Posts: 99,164
Joined: Nov 13 2004
Gold: 7,865.01
Jun 28 2019 02:40pm
melnyk shoulda been all over the marleau contract
its a 35+ buyout so it counts towards the cap hit but he only had to pay minimal salary amount to actually buy him out AND its only for 1 year
woulda got like 6m caphit for less then 1m actually paid out iirc

that is 100x better then taking on eriksson or lucic or zaitsev but melnyk was prob like "i dont wanna pay a player to not play"

This post was edited by dragoneth on Jun 28 2019 02:42pm
Member
Posts: 27,782
Joined: Dec 19 2011
Gold: 3,012.50
Jun 28 2019 02:43pm
Quote (dragoneth @ 28 Jun 2019 13:40)
melnyk shoulda been all over the marleau contract
its a 35+ buyout so it counts towards the cap hit but he only had to pay minimal salary amount to actually buy him out AND its only for 1 year
woulda got like 6m caphit for less then 1m actually paid out iirc

that is 100x better then taking on eriksson or lucic or zaitsev but melnyk was prob like "i dont wanna pay a player to not play"


yeah he should be drooling over dead contracts, high cap hits with least amount of real money he has to pay to the player

lucic & zaistev wouldnt be a good contract for him to take though, as a lot of money is still owed. Melynk would might as well just sign a UFA at high AVV for much less term.

This post was edited by Secksii on Jun 28 2019 02:47pm
Member
Posts: 19,003
Joined: Jan 27 2007
Gold: 0.10
Jun 28 2019 02:47pm
Lotsa hot takes on Kessel


"Off the ice, Sullivan and other staff believe Kessel would be a better player - and set an example for younger Penguins players - if he showed a "greater commitment to fitness," sources told Rossi."

"Furthermore, Kessel's status as a regular at a local casino was apparently not viewed as an issue until younger players, including Jake Guentzel, started joining him there on days before games, which other players were told was frowned upon."

Some also think Kessel is partially at fault for Malkin's declining defensive play over the past two seasons. Sources told Rossi that they believe Malkin has picked up some of Kessel's bad defensive habits, including "inconsistent backchecking, inattentiveness regarding own-zone responsibilities, and poor puck management in the neutral zone."
Go Back To Hockey Topic List
Prev1111711181119112011211445Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll