d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Hockey > Salary Recapture Penalties Reduced > Some Teams Will Receive Relief
Prev12
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 36,975
Joined: Jun 23 2007
Gold: 17.02
Jul 8 2020 07:44pm
They'll LTIR Weber and I'm sure Parise finds a way too (back issues). Suter I dunno he can prolly play till 40.
Member
Posts: 28,246
Joined: May 27 2009
Gold: 18,101.00
Jul 8 2020 07:57pm
Quote (Secksii @ Jul 8 2020 06:18pm)
Joke ass league lmao

First, this joke league gets 200iq outsmarted by Gillis and Gilman, approving luongo's contract.

Second, preds and other teams copy and abuse the contract format, and league decides to create the penalty.

Third, they included the Canucks to the penalty AFTER initially approving it

Fourth, they punish the Canucks because lu actually fulfilled most of his contract and was decent throughout until the last 2 yrs left. Florida pressures lu to retire, and he does.

Fifth, now they change it up for the other teams because it will punish them too hard :rofl: (wasn't that the fucking point?)
I mean they'll still be punished, but having 7.8cap for 3 years is a lot different than 24mil cap in a single year.

If anything the Canucks should have more leeway from the league, yet they're the most punished lmfao


Exactly. The spread still stings but it pales in comparison to a $24 million hit during one season. That would force you to trade away at least one star player for peanuts because other teams know you have no choice.

With the 7M spread you probably won't be able to ice a playoff team but you are not going to be forced to trade away one (most likely more than one) star player away for a bag of pucks while having your entire 3rd line, 4th line, and half your defense filled in with plugs because that is all you could afford.

The idea was to punish those who abused the system. So much for that. Furthermore the league should have done a better job implementing the cap scheme. Instead they release one that is ripe for loopholes to be exploited.

Pretty embarrassing to be so easily outsmarted lol. Maybe that is why the Canucks got shafted on this. The league is still probably bitter about them pioneering those type of contracts.

This post was edited by Killingyouall on Jul 8 2020 08:02pm
Member
Posts: 27,781
Joined: Dec 19 2011
Gold: 3,012.50
Jul 8 2020 08:47pm
Quote (Killingyouall @ 8 Jul 2020 18:57)
Exactly. The spread still stings but it pales in comparison to a $24 million hit during one season. That would force you to trade away at least one star player for peanuts because other teams know you have no choice.

With the 7M spread you probably won't be able to ice a playoff team but you are not going to be forced to trade away one (most likely more than one) star player away for a bag of pucks while having your entire 3rd line, 4th line, and half your defense filled in with plugs because that is all you could afford.

The idea was to punish those who abused the system. So much for that. Furthermore the league should have done a better job implementing the cap scheme. Instead they release one that is ripe for loopholes to be exploited.

Pretty embarrassing to be so easily outsmarted lol. Maybe that is why the Canucks got shafted on this. The league is still probably bitter about them pioneering those type of contracts.


Drancer said it best,

If you design a retroactive penalty so stupid that it only ever really punishes one club and has to be amended because it poses a liability significant enough to threaten the practical operation of two others, you should probably just repeal it entirely.
Member
Posts: 6,218
Joined: Sep 13 2016
Gold: 2,657.74
Jul 8 2020 11:10pm
Quote (Killingyouall @ Jul 8 2020 06:57pm)
Exactly. The spread still stings but it pales in comparison to a $24 million hit during one season. That would force you to trade away at least one star player for peanuts because other teams know you have no choice.

With the 7M spread you probably won't be able to ice a playoff team but you are not going to be forced to trade away one (most likely more than one) star player away for a bag of pucks while having your entire 3rd line, 4th line, and half your defense filled in with plugs because that is all you could afford.

The idea was to punish those who abused the system. So much for that. Furthermore the league should have done a better job implementing the cap scheme. Instead they release one that is ripe for loopholes to be exploited.

Pretty embarrassing to be so easily outsmarted lol. Maybe that is why the Canucks got shafted on this. The league is still probably bitter about them pioneering those type of contracts.


That's why I hope the Canucks and local sports media pounds the NHL 24/7 over this. At the end of the day cap recapture will only punish Vancouver and the worst abusers get a free out-of-jail card for completely arbitrary reasons, not even counting the LTIRetirement loopholes.
Member
Posts: 27,781
Joined: Dec 19 2011
Gold: 3,012.50
Jul 8 2020 11:49pm
Quote (Hizkuntza @ 8 Jul 2020 22:10)
That's why I hope the Canucks and local sports media pounds the NHL 24/7 over this. At the end of the day cap recapture will only punish Vancouver and the worst abusers get a free out-of-jail card for completely arbitrary reasons, not even counting the LTIRetirement loopholes.


They won't because they know it won't do shit, and the nhl will further be a joke and make it worse lmao

What's next? Canucks win the lottery for the first time and they say nvm it doesn't count because they're gonna change the rule on the spot? Jajajaja
Member
Posts: 39,227
Joined: Mar 1 2006
Gold: 12,140.00
Jul 9 2020 02:26am
lmao

bush league as per usual
Go Back To Hockey Topic List
Prev12
Add Reply New Topic New Poll