d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Hockey > Leafs Vs Jets
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 47,321
Joined: Aug 27 2008
Gold: 0.00
Mar 31 2018 06:17pm
Jets had a delayed penalty so the Leafs pulled their goalie to get an extra attacker.. The play was blown dead becahse Kadri jumped too early and McBackup was not even close to the bench.

Yet the Leafs didn't get a penalty.. Isn't that too many men ?
Member
Posts: 43,629
Joined: Jun 19 2009
Gold: 0.00
Mar 31 2018 06:22pm
I missed it and the goal... 1st time i went to the kitchen damn.
Member
Posts: 16,751
Joined: May 15 2011
Gold: 4,152.00
Mar 31 2018 06:28pm
nhl reffings almost as retardet as that suomi kid
Member
Posts: 51,682
Joined: Jul 27 2007
Gold: 0.90
Mar 31 2018 06:32pm
Lol gardiner little fucking retard
Member
Posts: 36,830
Joined: Jul 14 2008
Gold: 1,041.68
Mar 31 2018 06:39pm
Quote (Twax @ Mar 31 2018 05:17pm)
Jets had a delayed penalty so the Leafs pulled their goalie to get an extra attacker.. The play was blown dead becahse Kadri jumped too early and McBackup was not even close to the bench.

Yet the Leafs didn't get a penalty.. Isn't that too many men ?



It’s always just whistled down if a player replacing the goalie jumps early. Never seen it called a penalty.
Member
Posts: 43,629
Joined: Jun 19 2009
Gold: 0.00
Mar 31 2018 06:52pm
Quote (Meatstick @ Mar 31 2018 08:32pm)
Lol gardiner little fucking retard


i really wonder about this kid sometimes...
Member
Posts: 47,321
Joined: Aug 27 2008
Gold: 0.00
Mar 31 2018 07:03pm
Quote (GSG @ Mar 31 2018 08:39pm)
It’s always just whistled down if a player replacing the goalie jumps early. Never seen it called a penalty.


First time I've seen it happen personally. It's doesn't make much sense imo.. Too many men is too many men..

Not arguing with you I'm just saying the rule doesn't make sense.
Member
Posts: 43,629
Joined: Jun 19 2009
Gold: 0.00
Mar 31 2018 07:21pm
Quote (Twax @ Mar 31 2018 09:03pm)
First time I've seen it happen personally. It's doesn't make much sense imo.. Too many men is too many men..

Not arguing with you I'm just saying the rule doesn't make sense.


There's really no advantage unless the goalie is still in the net or tries to make his way back.

in that case it should be a penalty.

This post was edited by zNick on Mar 31 2018 07:22pm
Member
Posts: 47,321
Joined: Aug 27 2008
Gold: 0.00
Mar 31 2018 07:30pm
Quote (zNick @ Mar 31 2018 09:21pm)
There's really no advantage unless the goalie is still in the net or tries to make his way back.

in that case it should be a penalty.


He was about 20 feets from the bench and Kadri was arleady in the Jets zone. Refs blew the whistle but apparently it doesn't warrant a penalty. Doesn't make much sense.
Member
Posts: 42,679
Joined: Jul 8 2008
Gold: 8,000.00
Mar 31 2018 08:32pm
Illegal substitution

"An illegal substitution shall be deemed to have occurred when a player enters the game illegally from either the players bench (teammate not within the five(5) foot limit, refer to rule 74- Too Many Men on the Ice), from the penalty bench(penalty has not yet expired), when a major penalty is being served and the replacement player does not return to the ice from the penalty bench(see rule 68.2), or when a player illegally enters the game for the sole purpose of preventing an opposing player from scoring on a breakaway(see also Rules 68.3 and 68.4)"
Go Back To Hockey Topic List
12Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll