Quote (knucks101 @ Mar 29 2015 08:40pm)
in 2012 he wasn't running the list
Oh so Now its ok because he should be the latest shitty list runner who protects welchers and supports bad rules?
Or should we cut counter-intuitive bad rules that protect scammers?
Quote (teabaggery)
that was because he got the FG upfront and responded to it
Irrelevant. In both cases it sends a message of clear intent to accept the bet, whether the fg was sent upfront or not.
You're an already welcher-tagged scumbag trying to scam new kids, whether the list runner currently condones it or not.
This post was edited by cambovenzi on Mar 29 2015 06:47pm