Quote (SSBBWGiantessLover @ May 17 2021 07:47pm)
regular season wins aren't based on betting volume, they're based upon how talented the team is. the only teams that were in the 60 win range were Golden State, Houston, and Boston because they were all considered to be loaded
Boston fell short of their expectations but that doesn't suddenly mean they were shit. that was a very talented team that was deep as fuck
It's based off of public hype and projected betting volume. Those lines (or game totals) are set the way they are with the intention to get as much even money as possible to ensure a profit. If a team is going to be loved by the public, they'll set steep odds to prevent people from piling on and having the bets become lopsided.
That Boston team was talented on paper, they had absolutely terrible chemistry and that was no secret. Kyrie just didn't fit in, they were 12-3 that season WITHOUT him and when he came back it basically made them worse statistically. In Irving’s two seasons with the Celtics (2017-18 and 2018-19) with him in the lineup, the Celtics went 78-49, good for a 61.4 percent winning percentage. They went 26-15 without Irving during the regular season, a (63.4 win %). The Celtics were also better in the playoffs without Irving. With him this postseason, the team went 5-4 and lost in the second round. Without him in the prior postseason Boston went 11-8 and made it to Game 7 of the Eastern Conference Finals.