Quote (DeRozan @ Apr 5 2022 08:06pm)
I mean there’s 5-7 teams better than them that didn’t intentionally lose a tonne of games over 4 years .
How do you tank that hard for that many assets and not wind up as a top 3 team ?
Especially when you look at players they passed on
Would you rather be a top 5-8 team in the league consistently for years, with a chance to win a title, or where they were in the 5 years pre process where they averaged 35 wins a season and were a fringe playoff team? I get there are other methods to building a team, but this was what the Sixers felt was a path to contention
Should they be a little bit better at this point? Maybe. But I wouldn't call the entire thing a failure. They've positioned themselves much better than where they were before. If intentionally losing for 4 years means you must win a title for it to be seen as a "success", than yeah they failed (so far). But I don't see it that way
The point about missing on draft picks, there were definitely mistakes throughout it all, no denying that. And that's probably why they're top 7-8 instead of a top 2-3 team
This post was edited by Red Sox on Apr 5 2022 08:19pm