?? Why is that? Lol he would be perfect for the current and future. Unless we trade for a Giannis or sign RFA Hassan Whiteside via sign & trade or some shit like that, we have to go with Wiseman for the future. & when our studs are done we continue & build around him. I think it’s a no brainer.

Not picking up a injury prone Simmons coming off of another surgery. Lol.

Terrible for the Sixers, would never happen.

I just find it funny that Warriors fans always low-ball and say it's an overpay for trades that actually favor them

Spoiled with dumb ass contracts like Cousins and Durant taking less than the max to make absurd teams that shouldn't exist.

Crazy how people are willing to take a pay cut to be with the right culture & win.

Y’all can keep the Simmons minus knee caps, if he recovers well I’ll let you know if we will trade Paschal for him or not. Rofl rofl.

Taking less money is bad for the league, that bothers me way more than him joining the Warriors in the first place.

Demanding trades is far worse than taking less money

LeGM wouldn't allow Wiggins to develop in Cleveland, but in this case he was absolutely correct to send him packing to Minnesota.

What's your take, would you rather trade the #2 or develop?

I want the best chance to win the title next year.

But I also want to win with Wiggins.

Worse in what way? If you mean a worse look for the player then yes I agree. If you mean worse for the league then I disagree. If Beal decides he needs off of that trash team and demands a trade then fine, shouldn't have signed the contract in the first place. If Kawhi decided to join the Lakers and take a pay cut so they could have a deeper roster, that ruins the parity of the league by allowing the creation of a team that isn't supposed to exist.