I said some, not most. I have nothing against him anyway.

Cuz you've been here since January kid



Lol only cuz he called out your welching ass rolf rolf

This post was edited by Kimtown on Mar 31 2015 06:06pm

Son the fk? I been here for years.

you dont even know the story KID

I directly addressed and clarified a new misconception about a different set of rules that I just posted and agreed with him on part of the issue. Hardly the same thing.
I believe what I recently posted demonstrated that a system that is different than what we have now could work just fine, as it has in the NHL section. A considerable step forward.
Whether a c'd the c'd with exactly the word c'd is the best way to go is a matter of opinion.

"i dont know the history"
I've been active tagged here for several years and was an active bettor for years before that.
I was one of the main posters giving eniac shit when he was running his bs.
I also posted strongly in the thread of the issue sherriff brought up. I was around for the history.

I spend more time in the football and baseball sections






I think there are problems with it and it could be better and more intuitive. I wouldn't say im angry.
My strongly worded defense of my opinion is being perceived as something more.

Im not going to go 'errr my god i wont bet anymore cuz i think the rules should be different'.
I chalk it up as a difference of opinion and plan to move on when people are done responding and asking questions.

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Mar 31 2015 06:24pm

Confirmed rule was set even before Eniac scammed his shit way out iirc.

Your method of ''universal English'' or whatever was it, has more loopholes... because people would say ''gl'' (for instance) and you could assume this as a negative thing such as; ''yeah, right, go fuck yourself.'' or as a positive one: ''we good, the bet is on.''

How could you determine what the real deal was? You can't... because it could've gone either way.

This post was edited by Frozen on Mar 31 2015 06:24pm

I guess, I suppose.

Why not

Its all good

You could simply cut out the 2nd confirmation and count all unambiguous confirmations as a confirmation in addition to 'confirmed'
No subjectivity involved.

if its ''we good, the bet is on.'' thats a confirmation.

A post in clear terms like what teabaggery did "I WANT THIS BET WITH YOU 5fg vs 200fg" thats intent he wants the bet and if the other guy confirms it, its a bet.

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Mar 31 2015 07:07pm