I don't think it has anything to do with being list runner. Stuart, if it was you that was on a hot streak I would say the same thing, I'd want you to keep posting your picks from your formula so I could follow them.

I realize it's probably a hot streak. I hope not so it can be a long term thing. But I'm enjoying it while I can.

This post was edited by SaF7 on Feb 23 2015 01:47pm

So many math prodigies here.

do you back all of your bets with a satisfaction guarantee?

doesn't work on your phone far as i know but if u want a post blocker read up in my sig

nice response.
great way to weasel out of saying something educated and informative, since you clearly don't understand my analysis
i am by no means a mathematical prodigy, but I clearly know substantially more than you
due to your blatant lack of knowledge on statistics and risk, I don't see why anybody would put a shred of trust in your picks

I wasn't even completely discrediting you... not that you understood anything i said anyway

but he's the sheriff!

I don't need a post blocker, even though I have one. They can say all the shit they want. They have already thrown out everything I said and are making shit up, so they are running out of material, especially since I'm still winning. 5-1 last night is fine by me, I'm ready for tonight's games to start.

Why would u block posts, half the fun of jsp sports forums is arguing

making shit up? as i mentioned before, ESPN did an article on Billy Walters a few weeks ago and his best betting season in college football was just over 60%... you're claiming you can hit 75%+ lol

http://espn.go.com/espn/feature/story/_/id/12280555/how-billy-walters-became-sports-most-successful-controversial-bettor

"He has boasted that he has suffered only one losing season in 39 years, and past criminal investigations provide a snapshot of his success. The 1985 raid against the Computer Group revealed that the syndicate won an eye-popping 60.3 percent of its college football picks one season. More recently, an unsuccessful money-laundering case in 2002 found that Walters was consistently winning as much as 58 percent a week, sources told ESPN."

This post was edited by stuartg85 on Feb 23 2015 03:08pm

It saves my eyes for important posts.