d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Basketball > Sopranos Seasonal Saucey Locks > Or Busts Idk
Prev1131415161754Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 22,297
Joined: Jul 3 2009
Gold: 15.00
Oct 28 2017 09:26pm
And the “fade lakers total” strikes again, another massive below the total finishing, -25 points 💰

Vegas, thank you for the filet again 👌🏼
Member
Posts: 26,529
Joined: Nov 18 2013
Gold: 20,241.01
Oct 28 2017 09:30pm
2day was 2EZPZ
Member
Posts: 22,297
Joined: Jul 3 2009
Gold: 15.00
Oct 30 2017 02:50pm
My record: 13-7
Fade hydro record: 12-9

My picks: jazz/mavs under 190, mavs +8.5, warriors -5.5 and blazers -2

Jazz/mavs under 190 reasoning: love taking the jazz under for most games, as evident by my last pick, which was an easy fucking lock. The jazz/laker game finished 30ish points below the total, why vegas would total that game at 203 is beyond me. The lakers are a better offensive team than the mavs, but allow 12 more points scored than the mavs, while the mavs average 10 less ppg than the lakers. What this means to me is, the mavs will score less or damn near close to what the lakers did, which was 81 points, but will hold the jazz to lesser points than the lakers did, which was 96, telling me the under should be a lock. The mavs under has hit 4 out of the last 6, while the jazz under has hit 5 out of the last 6. Mavs average 91ppg on the road and allow 101ppg, while the jazz average 99ppg and allow 88ppg. The jazz also play at the slowest pace in the league, so this is going under.

Mavs +8.5 reasoning: dallas is 6-3 ats vs the jazz in the long run. The jazz have no go to scorer since hayward departed. They rely on favors/gobert/hood to generate them points, and currently it is still the “figuring it out” phase for the jazz offense. The mavs may be 1-6 overall, but 4 of those losses were decided by 9 points or less. The jazz arent a fast, run and gun team, 8.5 is a lot to cover for a jazz team, yes they beat the lakers by 15, but up until the last 3 minutes of the fourth, it was neck and neck and the lakers very well could have stolen the win, but the lakers, as they typically do, fold under pressure and forget how to score. The mavs have experienced players on their roster, thisll be a closer game decided by a bucket or two max.

Warriors -5.5 reasoning: 1-6 ats doesnt build a lot of faith in taking the warriors, but that record is deceiving. They had a very brutal start to the season in terms of scheduling and if you noticed from last year, vegas typically overvalues the warriors and people buy into the whole “hurr durr its the warriors, 58 point blowout incoming” but theyve added new pieces to their system, and kerr is toying with rotations still. That said, i think the loss yesterday to the pistons (as much as a fluke that it was) lights a fire under the warriors asses and they come out swinging. On paper, the warriors have the clear advantage in pg/sg blake is good, but kd at pf is >, gallinari is a more potent scorer than green, but greens defense is >>>>, dj at center is their only clear cut advantageous position. Had the warriors not turned the ball over 20+ times last night, the pistons would have been ass raped. Warriors should bounce back and remind the league theyre the best tonight. They are 10-0 su vs the clippers, with a 12 point average margin of victory and are 4-1 ats their last 5 games vs the clippers.

Blazers -2 reasoning: blazers are hot as shit at home, raptors are wrapping up a west coast trip where they have been underperforming, that lakers game was fucking atrocious. Blazers are 4-1 their last 5 games and 7-2 the last 9 games against the raptors at home. Cj and lilard have been stellar so far, while lowry seems to be in a funk. The raptors are hurting at center, and i think thatll cause a problem when going up against nurkic tonight.
Member
Posts: 72,025
Joined: Dec 30 2007
Gold: 95.40
Warn: 30%
Oct 30 2017 04:18pm
damn...sopranos eating lobsta
Member
Posts: 22,297
Joined: Jul 3 2009
Gold: 15.00
Oct 30 2017 04:34pm
Quote (StealthGodx @ Oct 30 2017 03:18pm)
damn...sopranos eating lobsta



Thanks fam

Tryna put everyone here on a caviar and filet diet as well
Retired Moderator
Posts: 47,729
Joined: Sep 29 2007
Gold: 44,291.00
Trader: Trusted
Oct 30 2017 09:17pm
1-3 or 0-4 what will it be!?
Member
Posts: 22,297
Joined: Jul 3 2009
Gold: 15.00
Oct 30 2017 09:18pm
Quote (Boggy @ Oct 30 2017 08:17pm)
1-3 or 0-4 what will it be!?



1-3 you twat

3-0 yesterday, variance always bites you in the ass.
Member
Posts: 40,935
Joined: Sep 17 2004
Gold: 3,000.00
Warn: 40%
Oct 31 2017 02:41am
nice pick wog, i took clippers =(

i also took celtics for the day so i went even for the day, but unfortunately brings my record closer to 50%

11-9, 55% if my retardo math is correct
Member
Posts: 13,895
Joined: Oct 24 2012
Gold: 1,000.85
Oct 31 2017 02:42am
Quote (Kimtown @ Oct 31 2017 01:41am)
nice pick wog, i took clippers =(

i also took celtics for the day so i went even for the day, but unfortunately brings my record closer to 50%

11-9, 55% if my retardo math is correct


with JUICE not that bad could be like hydro
Member
Posts: 22,297
Joined: Jul 3 2009
Gold: 15.00
Oct 31 2017 04:23pm
My record: 14-10
Fade hydro record: 13-10

Fade hydro pick: okc -1.5

My pick: nets/suns under 231

Recap of yesterday: what a shit show filled with fluke occurrences. Blazers held to 6 points in the second quarter, mavs having a dominant 16 point cover heading into the third and then promptly forgetting how to play basketball, which fucked up my under, sigh. Thats how it goes some days, rode a 4 pick winning streak, followed it up by a 1-3 day, but such is variance. Lets get back to wins shall we?

Nets/suns under 231 reasoning: Line is set at 231, nets home suns are traveling. Nets defense at home allows 114 points, suns allow 122 points on the road, however nets score 116ppg at home while the suns average 97 on the road. Combining the defensive averages for both teams allows a mean defensive score of 118 per team, which is higher by just 4 points for the nets and lower than the suns by 4, while their offenses tell us both teams dont even reach that number on an average night. The nets would have to score 2 more points to reach the mean score, while the suns need to score an additional 21 points. I like that buffer frankly. Outside of booker on the suns, they really dont have another dynamic scorer, with bledsoe out, the offensive burden will rest solely on his shoulders tonight. I see this game ending in the 222 total range tonight.
Go Back To Basketball Topic List
Prev1131415161754Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll