Warriors look tired tbh.
After pushing hard for 73 wins in the regular season.
Walking over the Rockets.
They met a challenge in Portland. Seems like that series took a lot out of the Warriors.
Now they're facing a more complete team in the Thunder, and the Warriors looked gassed.

Also true though, of all the major sports, basketball has by far the least variance, and the outcome of the season is typically very very close to the team's actual quality. NFL, MLB, NHL are all much more likely to have upsets.

d2jsp Forums > Viewing User Profile
You do not have access to view this members recent topics.

Anyone seen my keys?

I'm saying that they are. There is no other way. You can't say the best team didn't win when it isn't logical for another way to be done. The best team wins in 7 games. You don't have to agree they are better but they proved it.

Well Durant almost certainly can't play at this level, he is virtually neutralized by LeBron and can't stop him. The concern is mainly how do we defend Westbrook and will their big men and role players continue at this level?

Very unlikely that a team suddenly becomes this much better and maintains it without any personnel changes after having a full healthy season together.



Definitely not true. Seven games is far too small of a sample size for the best team to always win. Even 100 game series would maybe have one upset in a million runs.

This post was edited by Voyaging on May 24 2016 08:32pm

It's the champion, but it's not always the best team in the league.

it's true that the team that wins the seven game series played the best throughout the series.

it all depends on how you define best/better

Cavs advanced to the Finals already?

But it isn't logical. Over more games a team could get better, fatigue ect would set in. 7 games is perfect to pick the best team at that moment. It isn't like statistics were more is better. I do see your point tho.