i mean nash was a great player, 2 time MVP, 50/40/90, highly efficient

also, if you read what i wrote i said he was in the conversation, kobe was also in that conversation.

my point was that kobe was never even the undisputed best player of his era, so stans who put him in the overall goat conversation are just ridiculous.

This post was edited by Izzo4Rizzo on Mar 25 2021 05:18pm

yeah, nash shouldnt be in the conversation, because as great as he was on offense, he also was a complete liability on defense.

Ok, you are welcome to have that opinion

lol, its the truth bro, I was a big nash fan back in the day, dont come at me with "you are welcome to have an opinion" condescending shit, to be in the conversation for goat a player has to be great both ends of the floor.

I absolutely never made the claim that Nash was in the conversation for GOAT, I said he was in the top tier of players in the early-mid 2000s era, which given that he won 2 MVPs during that span shouldn’t really be an argument

Anyone who actually watched basketball in the 2000s knows Kobe was the undisputed best player of that era. Shaq would have been if he put in the effort.

Just like Lebron is the undisputed best of the 2010s. You want to bring up guys like steph when it comes to Lebron?

Tim Duncan was right there. He was an elite and quiet assassin. He did everything right.
Best all around big man I've seen besides Hakeem Olajuwon. I took Tim Duncan for granted.
I'm not a Spurs fan so I just admired his greatness. I miss those days. That era mattered!

well, in that case I apologize

had anyone pointed out the dude who said this is like a league low 22% from 3pt land