I compared starting Line Ups

That isn't saying individual players will win you games

b

The way you do it makes sense except for LBJ better then hill, west and stephonson combined so heat starting 5 is better

I dont think that is true

He cannot produce all three of those players stats and defensive intangibles

except lebron is so much >>>> than george hill that it still favors the heat lol

i think if dwade's ankle is still a problem, and the pacers focus on stopping lebron (double teams, clogging lane) and knowing lebron is a willing passer where he'll pass up shots if he is doubled and see someone open, i think the pacers do have a chance

This post was edited by SubZor on May 19 2013 01:27am

pacers starting five is great but they have no depth whatsoever

if they get in foul trouble they're done.

They won last year w/o bosh and the pacers had granger and miami didnt have this deep of a bench.

unfortunately, about 5% chance.

personally i think if the pacers had a healthy granger, different ball game. stephenson is not filling those shoes anytime soon. paul george has stepped up but if indy had granger starting alongside him, this series would be way closer then its gonna turn out to be.

yu kidding me? heat>pacers on paper yeah the pacers defense is on point but the heat 5 are great on offense and on defense.

are you kidding me Pacers have a better defensive starting 5

and its not even close..