Quote (Twax @ Aug 16 2017 07:37am)
What do you mean by the team can make you keep that player ? Like you're getting him for free ? What's the point in trading for him if you can get him for free with the waivers ?
I also am pretty confused with these post trade deadline waivers haha.
If a team would have claimed Verlander, the Tigers could (and probably would) have said "ok he is yours". Verlander is not worth that contract so no one would risk claiming him. To facilitate a trade the Tigers would need to eat a large chunk of his contract to get even a marginal prospect return.
Im a bit surprised no one claimed Stanton. That contract will probably be pretty appealing in a few years. The Marlins surely would not have just let the claiming team have him for nothing anyway.
Quote (AspenSniper @ Aug 16 2017 10:53am)
Interesting. Never totally understood it, thank you.
Np, shit is confusing
This post was edited by Ianarky on Aug 16 2017 10:16am