d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Baseball >
Poll > Hitter Or Pitcher?
123Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 28,172
Joined: Mar 2 2009
Gold: 0.00
Jul 28 2016 03:27pm
Was thinking about this earlier... Obviously a pitcher only goes every 5 games, but they have a greater effect in that game. Whereas a hitter goes every game, but has less of an effect on each individual game.

I think I would choose a pitcher, one individual hitter can only do so much especially if their team sucks (Trout).
Member
Posts: 28,665
Joined: Dec 7 2007
Gold: 17,345.00
Jul 28 2016 03:30pm
What good is 1 great hitter if your pitching will just give up the lead. Like previously stated, only 1 hitter can do so much.

Everytime someone goes out on the mound for us right now who isn't named Cole Hamels, I cringe because I know we're going to have to score A LOT of runs to win. Even Yu is struggling since coming back.

This post was edited by txO4 on Jul 28 2016 03:31pm
Member
Posts: 40,721
Joined: Jan 9 2007
Gold: 83.00
Jul 28 2016 03:36pm
Hitter.

Awesome position players sometimes have a WAR around 9.

You rarely if ever will see a pitcher with a WAR that high.

Basically a really good position player is worth more wins than a really good pitcher.
Member
Posts: 43,862
Joined: Aug 2 2015
Gold: 8,084.20
Jul 28 2016 03:45pm
Since it is a long term deal i will take a hitter like Trout over a pitcher like Jofer. TJ scares me. This is the same reason i choose a bat over sp in keeper leagues. I have burnt by Jofer, Waino etc. 1 or 2 years and id prefer the ace...

This post was edited by Ianarky on Jul 28 2016 03:45pm
Member
Posts: 81,512
Joined: Dec 22 2006
Gold: 13.37
Jul 28 2016 03:47pm
pitcher for sure ..

Member
Posts: 70,992
Joined: Jul 6 2010
Gold: 1,255.00
Jul 28 2016 03:47pm
Pitcher
Member
Posts: 60,666
Joined: Mar 3 2008
Gold: 809.00
Jul 28 2016 03:54pm
Pitcher
Member
Posts: 40,721
Joined: Jan 9 2007
Gold: 83.00
Jul 28 2016 03:56pm
I also feel like pitchers usually have shorter primes and are more injury prone.


Member
Posts: 43,862
Joined: Aug 2 2015
Gold: 8,084.20
Jul 28 2016 04:25pm
Quote (LeSausage @ Jul 28 2016 05:27pm)
Was thinking about this earlier... Obviously a pitcher only goes every 5 games, but they have a greater effect in that game. Whereas a hitter goes every game, but has less of an effect on each individual game.

I think I would choose a pitcher, one individual hitter can only do so much especially if their team sucks (Trout).



No criticism, just a question. Do you think the Angels would be a playoff contender with Kershaw (healthy) rather than Trout?
Member
Posts: 35,719
Joined: Jan 19 2004
Gold: 1,720.80
Jul 28 2016 04:41pm
Seems like the failure-rate on those big FA pitchers is a little higher than big-time hitters. I guess it would depend on age, since the prime for a pitcher is usually shorter (they're more prone to injury), whereas a good hitter can be steady until his mid-30s. If you're getting the player's best years and not paying for past production, then it's a good deal.

Like, you've got Arrieta sucking after being a Cy Young winner, Kershaw injured, Price was the big FA pitcher last offseason and he's a disappointment so far. (not saying these as FA signings, just looking at how fragile the position is)

This post was edited by Terps on Jul 28 2016 04:41pm
Go Back To Baseball Topic List
123Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll