Quote (omgimrich @ Nov 15 2011 11:57pm)
because they never have?? like i've asked a few times please show me one instance of them spending 20M+ per year on one player.
just because they haven't is a much better reason to not expect them to than to expect them to.
besides, even if they did offer the same or a little more than the yankees/red sox why would he chose the o's over either team?
Because they never have isn't a good reason at all. They haven't exactly had the type of player to invest in and build around since Cal Ripken Jr.
Speaking of which.. Cal Ripken Jr was an Oriole his entire career, and he was making $6.8m in mid-late 90s which was one of the higher contracts in baseball. I can't find exact numbers, but average salary in 1996 was $1.1m, in 2011 it was 3.3. 300% increase would bring Cal's to about $20.4m. Jajaja. That doesn't really mean much but I thought it was pretty funny.
If Wieters becomes valuable enough to warrant that kind of money (that's a HUGE if, $20m is a lot of money and usually only elite players make that much) I don't see why the Orioles wouldn't go out and spend the money. They won't have to compete with other teams unless they wait until Free Agency.