I do.

Just looked, tis true.
Good rotation, not so much with the bats.
Looks like itll work out.

lol, I wish I was team 1. Trout > Gordon, Reynolds, Weeks combined

Ish.



That's what I was thinking. This one may need some tweaking.

This post was edited by trib747 on Apr 16 2013 03:47pm

that trade is terribly one sided lol

So bad that I'm gonna have to veto it.

Mark S: that trade
Mark S: trib says he will veto
Kyle D: Then give back my buyin because fuck that shit, I didn't veto his fucking shit when it was in the same household.
We worked for 2 days for this deal.

the guy with trout/price could get a way better return

giving up a 1st rounder and 3rd rounder for a mediocre 2b, waiver wire add reynolds, and gordon

LOL WAT

Not even close

I dont blame trib for vetoing
this is an awful trade lmao

This post was edited by Profar on Apr 16 2013 08:07pm

-Even though you didn't personally vote to veto my trade, I still ended up altering it simply because a few people felt it might be slightly in my favor.
-The consensus here is that the trade is very lopsided, to the point of being laughably bad.
-The trade needs to be vetoed because it's incredibly unfair and stacks one team.
-My wife and I were working on the trade since the moment she was auto-drafted Votto weeks ago (she hates him).
-Asking for your buy-in back because you aren't allowed to stack your team is either immature or collusive. You tell me.