Quote (Schwarber @ Nov 25 2015 08:52pm)
It's impossible to compare different baseball era's.. back then nobody went to the bullpen and rarely anyone threw 100mph.. now you have starters barely going 6 and 75% of baseball throws 95+.
Yeah, I tend to agree /w that argument among most sports and their major records/players, but if a modern player who doesn't juice is going to compare himself to another player, it seems like the best of the bunch who aren't believed to have been juicing (in this case, Maris) should be the standard of comparison. Breaking the likes of Bonds, McGuire, and Sosa just doesn't seem possible without steroids (or some other rule changes like a longer season). Given that steroids have been banned, the avenue to break the record set by Bonds is now virtually closed off.
If you're just going by era, then how do you demarcate when one era ends and another begins? Who is your standard in each arbitrary era? It gets too vague for me. Maris is the best of the non-juicers, and that should be your standard, even if other factors regarding the league rules make this standard unattainable.
Quote (xVitality @ Nov 25 2015 09:09pm)
How do you know, definitively, that he wasn't using steroids?
Not like that year wasn't a massive outlier in his career.
You cannot know for sure. Steroid use was pretty new at the time, but it's still possible.
Even being an outlier in his career, are you suggesting that the 61 hr year was the only year he was juicing? Because it seems to me he would have done steroids the previous year when he hit 39 and in the following years when he was average, yet the stats didn't come. Why would he stop juicing? And if he kept juicing, then why would the stats just fall off?