18-9 bitch.

They didn't play good pitchers.

If we didn't have any injuries that would have been a SWEEP.

we played pretty terrible that series

This post was edited by dunwatchme on May 4 2009 02:33pm

WE PLAYED 4/5 OF YOUR PITCHERS.
So therefore, Only Roy Halladay is good on your team?

And I LOVE it how no one gives Kansas City any credit.
"Jays played bad."
It's never "Kansas City played Good"

This post was edited by ZeusPwnsAll on May 4 2009 02:34pm

I do have to admit that Kansas City is doing good though.
But however, the reason why the Jays lost in Kansas was simply because they weren't themselves during that stretch. I know you can argue and say "Our pitching was good", but it really isn't just that.
Things seemed rather abnormal for the Jays, they played a month afterall, so I know the whole jist of how they would normally play.
But I do have to say Gratz to how the Royals are doing this year, First in Central !!! Better record than the Yankees, and a large chunk of the American League.

So you're saying the only reason the Royals won was because Jays weren't playing like themselves?

So you could say the same about the past 10 or so years that they haven't been competing at all?

This post was edited by Greetings on May 4 2009 02:52pm

Royals pitching has been amazing this year. Even in games we lost.
Even 2 or 3 of Ponsons Shitty starts have been decent.

But it'll be fun playing the Jays again

Grienke is your only good pitcher. Bannister has gotten lucky the rest suck. KC's hitting is ass as well.

its been 1 month....

LOL.

Juan Cruz? Joakim Soria? Robinson Tejada?
Even most of Gil Meches and Kyle Davies's starts have been very solid.

Meche, Davies, Greinke, Bannister = 11-3

Everybody likes to throw this in for some reason.

Are the Yankees like a model for success or something that people have to compare good teams to?