Quote (Killerme99 @ Apr 2 2012 03:07pm)
I have shot both a fair amount. The Ruger seems to be referred to as the "better gun" by most people I talk to but for me the added weight on the Taurus made it a little easier to shoot.
Any reason in particular you are set on a .44?
See the post below yours; bear repellent.
Quote (ChowYunFat @ Apr 2 2012 09:29pm)
Hm. Kind of a tough call; if you're gonna be carrying as your "Plan B" anti-bear repellant, you're gonna want something big.
Neither is, of course, guaranteed to do anything but p!ss the bear off, unless you get a REALLY good series of shots in. That said:
The 7 1/2" barrel Super Redhawk weighs in at 53 oz.
I can't tell which model of Taurus that is, but the full barrel underlug should help with the recoil. Downside: makes the gun heavier. I think (?) this model is about 10 oz. (give or take) heavier than the Ruger.
Dependability between the two should be comparable. If there's a range anywhere around you where you can rent either, I'd go down and put a couple of boxes of ammo through each, and see which is more comfortable for you.
I'd also see what holster options there are for each (unless you have a local leathersmith that you like.) If it's gonna be your Plan B, you need to practice drawing it, A LOT.
I don't mind the weight, so reduced recoil is a huge plus, especially because 44. mag is such a powerful round. I'm a good shot (good enough to hit a bear several times as it approaches melee range) but of course as stress increases accuracy decreases.
The Taurus is the 446SS. Stands for 44 caliber, 6" barrel, stainless steel.