Quote (WSOP @ Sat, Jun 27 2009, 05:56pm)
No it's not pointless.
The point of making these threads is to see if the comunity thinks he is trusted enough to mediate bets.
It's not always up to meds / trusted to decide everything, the betting comunity have their words also.
There is no rule as to ''Actives shouldn't bet''. However, if you decide to chose an active member to mediate a bet, there are no guarantee this active will not steal you, as he is only on the list for betting actively, not for his trust.
Just an exemple, Andr3w just stole 20k fg 2 days ago. He was on active, and some people decided to let him med. Being on active doesn't mean you're trustworthy, yes most are, but there are also others like Andr3w that won't hesitate to steal whenever they can.
My 2 cents.
but 2 of the "trusted" site of the list welched too, so u NEVER can be 100% be sure
active =/= trusted is ofc true, but better an active as no med or a non listed one, because active means u care about the section
Quote (Shak @ Sat, Jun 27 2009, 06:00pm)
Same way andrew was trusted by everyone except meds
the same way vorrent was liked/respected by many and welched
gG
not like it matters
i can make a thread and pay people 5 fg va pm to vouch me and say their part of the community
half of the community is
"Man, he medded my 250 don, hes leet"
ive medded more than 250fg games^^
and why i should pay for my vouches lol?