yes u know that rule.
but the other one saying you have to be at least 3people at a all in game u know this one as well?

oh wait.

obv unintelligent* meds

*fixed

This post was edited by iceberg3366 on Jun 29 2009 03:25am

wouldnt say corrupt - he did a failure and now he cant get the fgs back - or he is just stubborn dunno what

5 Members: Mault, feinfuehl, iceberg3366, obisent, xMest

i lose my fg to bullshits

hes not right he isn't thinking either its pretty simple since another person jioned the cards he got u could not get because he got it so it effected the game

second when he wanted a a/i game he made the deal to only do it with nevada so when a 3rd person joined the deal ended that exact second and the med should have asked if they wanted to try another game or just get there fg back instead he didn't use any logic and just did what popped in his head first

They both should've realized upon joining a game like that, it was their own risk they couldn't wait until ps was back up. Fold = loss.

feinfuehl, dark-ghost, iceberg3366, d2dan, Bluff, obisent, xMest

c u
c u

This post was edited by feinfuehl on Jun 29 2009 03:09am

but since the deal wasn't a 3 man a/i they should've remade and tried again yea they took a risk by playing with out ps but there wouldn't be a risk if everyone woulda thought for a minute only reason nevada was mad was because he had a k and q im sure if he had a duece and a 3 he wouldn't have made a big fuzz about ng at all

since there deal was a 2 man a/i they shoula kept remaking intell it was just them two

it's not about the actual cards, of course them being dealt to someone else etc is pure theory

but if a player is holding one of your outs, then this is an unfair advantage that shouldn't exist in the first place, you should try not being a dumbass for like 5 minutes

wow the first and last time i agree with u.

u r still stuped.