Quote (Creationism @ Feb 25 2013 02:34am)
Lol just look at the difference in athletes. Just by saying that, I think you can tell who I voted for. I'd say either version of football (proper or american) > hockey. Stop with the slow pace argument. That's just non-sense, and you clearly don't understand the game. There is so much strategy involved in football, sorry if you don't take the time to appreciate it. I'm not trying to bash hockey either, its just imo, football tops it. I have watched hockey enough to appreciate what they are doing, and understand it takes talent to do such things, but the gameplay is just not for me. With football, each play is based on attacking a type of defense and exploiting flaws, holes, weakness, or on the other hand, defending a new offensive attack each play. I had scholarship offers for football and soccer (NAIA for football, d1 for soccer), so please do not try to discredit my argument by simply calling me a nerd.
Football was made to be strategic. Which is why they take breaks every 5 seconds. Its a slow sport.
Hockey bball and world football are fast paced strategic sports. Which is why the majority of Americans dont like it. Its to fast for them to understand. So football being for the slow minded is appealing to the masses in this country.