think u ppl r missing the point, 1 guy said tiger woods, tiger woods could very easily be compared to jack nichalas, you look at bradmans batting average of 99.94, the close to him of any era at any time is 30 runs behind, modern day greats average 50-55. bradman averaed almost double that, to find some1 who could compete compare modern day greats example bryant vs jordan, jordan doesnt score almost double bryants, woods doesnt have double his next players majors ect ect. no1 has dominated a sport to the extent bradman did cricket.