Quote (kkpkpkkp @ Dec 10 2012 04:41pm)
I blew up any argument for hunting on the first page, and everyone has been grasping for straws ever since
You can be independent, sure. No one is saying you can't. But what gives a human the right to go out into the animals habitat where it isn't harming anyone, and kill it? Meanwhile if any type of animal were to come into your land and kill a human, there would be a massive hunt to put the thing done.
Again, we are not the ignorant ones here, you guys are stuck in the old ways and can't see that the world has evolved
I laughed out loud at how ridiculous you sound here.
Ok, first of all, the bold: At the end of the day, this is an issue of rights. You claim to have "blown up" all the pro-hunting arguments but in reality you haven't even scratched the surface of what the hunting debate is truly about. First you need to derive the concept of rights (something you have not done), and then explain how that makes hunting immoral. By saying that hunting is somehow immoral, you have actually made a huge philosophical claim, and have completely failed to back it up on a philosophical level. What are rights, why do humans have rights, and can concept of rights extend to animals? Those are the questions you should be focusing on.
And about "being stuck in the old ways blah blah blah..." you're just emphasizing what I said in my own post, which is that you guys are little fascists, wanting everyone else to adapt to some kind of "modern" standard for living, because you have determined that this standard is the "correct" one to live by.
You're out of your league son, stick to debating about men in tights throwing around an egg shaped ball.
LOL and I just dug up this little gem from earlier in the thread: "
I already explained this, hunting is not your primary source of food therefore this is irrelevant"
You're so god damn stupid it hurts. Who are you to decide what people's primary source of food should be? You know better what people should eat than they do? Maybe some people find more value in hunting their own food? Maybe a single elk can feed a whole family for a year? Maybe it's way more affordable and fresh game tastes better? Maybe some people don't like to shop at supermarkets? These are all subjective value judgments based on people's
individual situations and preferences. Who are
you to determine what other people should be eating, how much they should pay for their food and how they should acquire it? Little fascist.
This post was edited by Paran0id on Dec 11 2012 12:18pm