d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > 9mm Vs .45 Auto
Prev12346Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 6,441
Joined: Apr 15 2006
Gold: 3.23
Feb 5 2012 10:37am
.45 clearly...if you're using it for protection im pretty sure that the person you're protecting against isnt going to be 100+ yards away...

and the extra 3-6 inches of drop is funny too...sure hit the guy in the chest with the 9 and he will drop...drop that shot 3 inches to the gut with the .45 and he will drop and you get to go kick him in the head a few times while laughing..

my buddy has a 9 and i have a .45, so honestly the .45 just feels so much more fun to shoot
Member
Posts: 4,647
Joined: Jul 21 2011
Gold: 1.01
Warn: 10%
Feb 6 2012 10:46pm
Quote (itzpookiie @ Feb 3 2012 01:28am)
and hit nothing but air


akimbo rangers?
Member
Posts: 25,660
Joined: Mar 16 2008
Gold: 3.60
Feb 7 2012 12:45am
Quote (BobScacamano @ Feb 7 2012 04:46am)
akimbo rangers?


destroy the bad guy and your own home
Member
Posts: 21,360
Joined: Dec 19 2008
Gold: 476.00
Feb 7 2012 04:57am
Quote (BobScacamano @ Feb 6 2012 09:46pm)
akimbo rangers?


it's not MW3
Member
Posts: 4,647
Joined: Jul 21 2011
Gold: 1.01
Warn: 10%
Feb 7 2012 04:59am
Quote (MisterFurious @ Feb 7 2012 06:57am)
it's not MW3


You are correct sir, its MW2!
Member
Posts: 20,646
Joined: Apr 10 2008
Gold: 6,970.00
Feb 7 2012 02:53pm
This might be of interest to you. (All you tl;dr people can skip to Conclusions at the end.)

http://www.firearmstactical.com/pdf/fbi-hwfe.pdf
Member
Posts: 17,247
Joined: Oct 19 2007
Gold: 484.02
Mar 1 2012 09:02pm
I prefer a .40 S&W over both if you are only going to own 1. It's a good compromise. You get more stopping power than a 9mm, and less recoil than a .45. Rounds are much cheaper than .45.


My carry gun is a Glock 23. Best of both worlds, right at 2 lbs loaded. Reliable. It's a great DEFENSIVE gun.


That said, the gun on the shelf of my nightstand is an old school S&W model 645. If someone breaks in my house, the fact that it is over 3.5lbs loaded and has enough recoil to blacken an eye doesn't matter. In this situation I don't want to miss and hit him in the arm only to have him run away. If I miss and hit him in the arm I want to blow it off altogether. This is the same theory as a short barreled shotgun.


I also have a Kel-tec Sub 2000 chambered in .40 S&W that accepts Glock mags. It makes a great backup to the 23 since the mags interchange.




It's all in what your intended use is. I don't know about Cali but most of the police stations around here issue Glock 22 and Glock 23 models for the .40 S&W's well rounded attributes.
Member
Posts: 25,660
Joined: Mar 16 2008
Gold: 3.60
Mar 2 2012 12:33am
Quote (FMX_89 @ Mar 2 2012 03:02am)
I prefer a .40 S&W over both if you are only going to own 1. It's a good compromise. You get more stopping power than a 9mm, and less recoil than a .45. Rounds are much cheaper than .45.


My carry gun is a Glock 23. Best of both worlds, right at 2 lbs loaded. Reliable. It's a great DEFENSIVE gun.


That said, the gun on the shelf of my nightstand is an old school S&W model 645. If someone breaks in my house, the fact that it is over 3.5lbs loaded and has enough recoil to blacken an eye doesn't matter. In this situation I don't want to miss and hit him in the arm only to have him run away. If I miss and hit him in the arm I want to blow it off altogether. This is the same theory as a short barreled shotgun.


I also have a Kel-tec Sub 2000 chambered in .40 S&W that accepts Glock mags. It makes a great backup to the 23 since the mags interchange.




It's all in what your intended use is. I don't know about Cali but most of the police stations around here issue Glock 22 and Glock 23 models for the .40 S&W's well rounded attributes.


why not build an ar that runs .40 s&w :thumbsup:
i personally think the sub 2000 looks ugly no offense
Member
Posts: 17,247
Joined: Oct 19 2007
Gold: 484.02
Mar 5 2012 10:02pm
Quote (itzpookiie @ Mar 2 2012 01:33am)
why not build an ar that runs .40 s&w :thumbsup:
i personally think the sub 2000 looks ugly no offense


$300. That's why. I didn't buy it to be pretty. It's functional, simple, and super reliable.

It had a completely different purpose than my ARs.
Member
Posts: 39,200
Joined: Dec 15 2004
Gold: 28,305.19
Mar 6 2012 01:41am
9mm vs 45 auto

9mm has less recoild but still has the neccisary stopping power. also is easier to maintain

45 auto packs a bigger punch but at the expense of accuracy and your shoulder.

i like my 9mm tactical from s&w better than my 45. but it comes down to personal prefferance
Go Back To Sports Coliseum Topic List
Prev12346Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll