50/50 doesnt equal 33/33/33

and i remember a thread where a kid had auto-sit out on during the tourny so he folded his hand and things got messed up and the meds decided to send both people their fg back

thats all im asking for...

This post was edited by iceberg3366 on Jun 29 2009 02:14pm

....

you just ignore the guy who isn't playing a/i with you guys and compare hands, i don't see why that's so difficult

it's still 50/50

i dont want a random effecting my or his chances of winning the hand, the only reason he is bitch is he had KQ, if he had 2/7os he would be mad, but if there were 2 people in that hand he wouldnt have gotten KQ, i dont even fucking know my cards b/c as soon as he joined i left the table

this... but my thoughts are this wasnt a fair deal... im with the few people(even tho i wasnt there) based on what ive read both should have restarted game wtf was a third in a game anyways 1on1 is 1on1 not 2on1 or 1on2 or 1on1on1(ok that doesnt make sense but it does!!) game should have been redone or fg sent back my thoughts!

he doesn't affect your chances of winning against Nevada

and the 'he wouldn't have gotten those cards' thing isn't even necessarily true, seeing as you don't know what the other cards were - plus, the code for pokerstars doesn't even necessarily work like a deck

fact of the matter is
REGARDLESS if theres a third player or not, chance of YOU beating NEVADA's hand preflop, is 50/50 before the hand is dealt - therefore this meets the definition of A/I, being a 50/50 game
ur looking for a coin flip, u got the coin flip, u lost the coin flip, now ur whining because something unexpected happened which DOES NOT IMPACT THE 50/50ness of the game pre dealing the hand out
thanks

e: sorry i keep saying preflop, i mean before the hand is dealt

This post was edited by aZnStriKer on Jun 29 2009 02:21pm

he does effect the chances of winning because there is a chance that he will get one or 2 of my outs and vis versa

i hate when people are bitches and try to get wins on "technicalities" when they are afraid to play it straight up 1v1 as it was intended to be

This post was edited by iceberg3366 on Jun 29 2009 02:23pm

the fact that the third player can hurt nevada as much as it can hurt u, thus it is still 50/50 prior to the hand being dealt
i dont see how u still fail to see this logic

e: U can simply view this as the same holdem hand, but instead of burning 1 card, the dealer burns 3 cards
otherwise, the game is still exactly the same as AI, still 50/50 b4 hand is dealt
obviously things change after the hand is dealt, but things always change in poker, after every street is dealt

This post was edited by aZnStriKer on Jun 29 2009 02:24pm

THE CHANCES OF YOU BEATING NEVADA IS STILL 50/50 AND VICE VERSA. IF THE PRESENCE OF A 3RD PERSON ACTUALLY CHANGED THE ODDS, I WOULD AGREE WITH YOU, BUT HE HAVING A 3RD PERSON DOES NOT EITHER HELP OR HURT EITHER OF YOU.



THANK YOU

but i dont want there to be a chance he can hurt one of us, if there wasnt a 3rd person then there wouldnt be a chance for ANYONE to be hurt, thus making it more even