omg did I mistype a word I don't really use then couldn't be bothered to go back and edit it?
you realise mensa is a iq test right? I know they started doing their own thing in america that doesn't relate to others but it's pretty standard everywhere else, it tests pattern recognition/abstract reasoning/spatial recognition etc
the only language stuff is logic basic using words you're supposed to know, Pear is to apple as potato is to? and no it's no where near 50% more like 20-25%, maybe if you count everything with a worded question. It uses verbal reasoning btw, different to the language comprehension you seem to be on about
fyi my iq is arround 150-160, you need 130 to join mensa i believe

This post was edited by dakariii on Aug 29 2015 01:58am

"omg," you're still doing it.
and, i'm bored with you. if you're lieing to yourself there's no reason to bother continuing this conversation. I just don't have the energy to pick apart every error in your logic right now.

i will say this though, there are two different IQ tests, with different scoring, but either way the top 98th percentile is required to join mensa. (and the 10 minute facebook test you took is trash).

you're both wack

ty

jesus did I really? my bad
meh i'm mostly going off a proper one i did as a child, I was a bit of a retarded kid, couldn't spell stuff and had some weird bilateral thing going on but still had a really high iq. Adjusted a bit by myself for my current level (i know its not supposed to change lol), the free online ones don't seem capable of doing accurate scores over 130-150. I'll try to do a proper one in future and will refrain from further comment until then but it's definitely 140 or higher as that's what it was as a retarded kid
and no there aren't two different iq tests, there's many different versions but they're all supposed to give the same score. The american mensa test i mentioned isn't considered an iq test but it does qualify you for membership.
"When current IQ tests are developed, the median raw score of the norming sample is defined as IQ 100 and scores each standard deviation (SD) up or down are defined as 15 IQ points greater or less"

And I didn't really need logic to argue against you last time as you're not making arguments on debatable topics but saying stuff that is wrong that needs correcting. I think you're confusing logic with grammar again

This post was edited by dakariii on Aug 30 2015 02:47am

IQ is only a measurement of potential. Sitting on d2jsp and playing games all day is not using that potential.
Therefore having a high IQ is completely irrelevant and not important. Nothing to be proud of whatsoever. If anything it's completely wasted when it could go to someone hard working.

Also highly doubt your IQ is 160.
That's the 99.99% percentile
Not even worth stating if it was true because nobody would ever believe you.

This post was edited by FroggyG on Aug 30 2015 03:00am

He was the one who brought up the mensa thing
Well it's intelligence ie potential for learning, true you need to go out and actually learn stuff to acquire knowledge/skills/wisdom
160 is probably a bit high, i guess around 150 now so like 153 is 150-160 I explained myself more clearly later
Don't really care what people think

Games aren't that bad a use of time either, you can develop a lot of skills, reflexes, coordination, strategy, maths all the iq things i mentioned earlier pattern recognition, spatial awareness, abstract reasoning
And I don't see how you can bash my forum use when you've posted 10x as much in less time, I've been doing a nice average 0.8-1 posts a day for years and you have no idea what else I do/have done

This post was edited by dakariii on Aug 30 2015 05:55am

the Stanford–Binet, Weschler and the Cattell Intelligence Scales
the Stanford and Weschler are pretty close, the top 98th percentile is a little over 130, while for the Cattell about 150.
//edit: looked it up Stanford-Binet 132 == Weschler 130 == Cattell 148

I took the mensa test, Stanford and Catell, and i'm telling you that the mensa test is not the same as IQ testing. this is a fact, you cant just make shit up that you feel is correct up to deny it. It is the mensa test, the apa denounced the test, and disallowed the organization from using the term IQ test like 20 years ago. If you ever go through psychological testing, you will take at least 1 IQ test as well tests for personality and behavior. The comprehensive testing i went through took place over the course of a few weeks, taking both IQ tests, and a host of other testing. Psychological testing measures performance at a specific point in time, it's never used to measure innate potential or predict the future. it's all too obvious that you've never taken any actual psychologist administered testing, every word you type out makes it more obvious. Your only source of information is bad television.

why am i even back here... i thought i had grown out of this bad habit of getting baited into stupid arguments with liars. twice in a week now i pop in here and just can't help myself.

/done

This post was edited by Ideophobe on Aug 30 2015 11:48pm

Iq 150? Are you using those facebook iq test lol
i remember clicking randomly for every answer and getting like 110.. so i doubt youre 150

bad television? lol
maybe if you don't want to get into arguments don't start shit with people
and no iq tests don't have to be administered by a phsychologist, there's many different routes, whats true for you isn't true for everyone else
as i said i did one as a kid, it was part of series of tests but they were also testing reflexes coordination learning etc because they thought i might be dyslexic and I had some bilateral tendencies, I've also done aptitude tests at end of school and while my english was bad 60% everything else, logic maths spatial reasoning, can't remember what else were all in the 95+% percentile
are you american? i keep saying that the american mensa test isn't an iq test lol, there do seem to be iq tests that use different standard deviation depending on where you look but according to wiki there all supposed to use 15 now, easily equatable anyway
iq=intelligence quotient=design to measure human intelligence, learning potential is based on intelligence, I don't see how you can argue this, unless you try and confuse it with some psychological testing that probably looking for something else

is this supposed to be an insult most people don't need to see psychologists, to me this means that what i'm saying makes me seem like a normal and well balanced individual

This post was edited by dakariii on Aug 31 2015 02:33am