Quote (IgoSoHard @ Feb 28 2016 01:40am)

I thought he was really good in perks of being a wall flower, but yeah he's definitely a lesser known actor but I think he'll do fine...but maybe not haha.

Quote (IgoSoHard @ Feb 28 2016 03:40am)

Yeah, it'll be two different universes but yeah, still a little weird haha. I think DC knows what their doing though. They're having supes/batman/WW in!BvS but only teasing flash/Aqua/cyborg. Having them all on the big screen together as prominent roles in justice league then once their established, give the others their own movies. They don't have to follow marvels model, they probably want to be different.


I thought he was really good in perks of being a wall flower, but yeah he's definitely a lesser known actor but I think he'll do fine...but maybe not haha.

Yeah, Grant does a pretty good job but the show is pretty corny at times, although I still enjoy it.

Yeah, I he's a much more talented actor.



Have you watched Daredevil or Jessics Jomes on Netflix ? They get pretty dark for superhero shows, which I like


Well, it makes sense (in the realm of superheroes :p ) if you read the comics it's based off of. They can't do the Justice League without Superman, 0% chance he dies

Quote (Bazi @ Feb 27 2016 09:02pm)

1. Then your hypothetical shouldn't have used one
2. Young gun didn't imply female as you falsely inferred, it implied any aspiring actor/actress
3. Didn't read
4. If I had this huge romantic male dominated society notion I wouldn't be married to a female physician

Quote (card_sultan @ Feb 28 2016 01:00pm)

1. There are only a few corporate media outlets, that's not hypothetical as you suggest - please do some research, try google.
2. I didn't imply "young gun" is female - I'm saying that your use of "young gun" only refers to males and really implies using their "gun" as a weapon - It's really sexist male rape terminology that you use, but I'm also aware that you might not even be conscious of your Freudian slip.
3. Themes > bit actors
4. Sexual predators are often married too, that you're suggesting that you married a woman as some proof, it is not only a pretty weak argument, it essential confirms your motives.

Quote (CMBurns @ Mar 2 2016 03:04am)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Y8iRvQdSGA

Quote (card_sultan @ Feb 28 2016 11:00am)

1. There are only a few corporate media outlets, that's not hypothetical as you suggest - please do some research, try google.
2. I didn't imply "young gun" is female - I'm saying that your use of "young gun" only refers to males and really implies using their "gun" as a weapon - It's really sexist male rape terminology that you use, but I'm also aware that you might not even be conscious of your Freudian slip.
3. Themes > bit actors
4. Sexual predators are often married too, that you're suggesting that you married a woman as some proof, it is not only a pretty weak argument, it essential confirms your motives.