Gladiator 10x

ah doves always enjoy your comments Lol

this guy posted the same thing in hockey. lol. and we ended up having the same argument.

the best part is that OP came to a gaming forum to prove his friend wrong by popular opinion about a matter which is opinion based.

here the thread for the lols http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=71690691&f=203

For you it does, not for everyone. Thus it's subjective.

If every living person on this planet prefered Gladiator over Troy i'd agree it's objectively the better film but this is not the case and will never be the case with any two films ever.



Correct and that's why using box office sales as a measure for quality is ridiculous.

This post was edited by Svartermetalisk on Dec 3 2014 02:34am

I don't think anyone suggested that box office sales should be used, some films do well and are terrible


It is subjective but not for that reason. An orange provides more vitamin C for some people but isn't subjective.
Before you say an orange has the same amount of vitamin C to start with a movie has the same number of pixels, like everything it depends on what your body does with what it recieves



so ever person has to agree with something for it to be true, that's the point you draw the line? I proved with earlier examples that the odd persons opinion doesn't change the inherent reality of something for the rest of us

lel still arguing about no right or wrong q..

There may be two answers but this isn't a multiple choice question. Anyone that votes Troy needs to take a plane to switzerland and turn yourself in at the geneva convention for human rights violations.

I really enjoyed them both but Gladiator wins for me

e/ If someone prefers Troy over Gladiator thats up to them, Everyone has different tastes

This post was edited by Sire on Dec 3 2014 10:02am

We are not talking about everything here, there will allways be people that disagree with stuff that is good as proven such as the Holocaust for example. This topic however is not good as proven, it's up to the beholder to decide which is the best film because there is no good way of measuring the quality of a picture you keep claiming there is but you can't explain how it's done.
You haven't provided any decent examples of how you measure the quality of a film EXCEPT popularity and some other really vague suggestions, but when I call you out on it you agree that box office results is a poor way to measure how good a film is so im asking you again: How do you decide which is the best out of two films, what criterias do you use?

What it boils down to is this: If you can't scientifically prove something then it's not a fact, if it's not a fact you shouldn't pretend there's a right and wrong answer.

You can't prove art, it dosen't work.

This post was edited by Svartermetalisk on Dec 3 2014 09:45am

You want to punish people for not liking a film, really?

I'm gunna assume your age is around 11? 10?