How did you deduce he implied that? He mearly said the story and dialog is terrible, which it is.

Doesn't mean he jizzed over the action though does it? Clever clogs.

I've said nothing like that and I never would. I believe I've criticized Jackson earlier in this thread for switching to shitty looking CGI. This entire trilogy is a massive let down.

Please, tell me why you believe so.

Thanks

It's all forced and unbelievable. The ring garbage is horrible, Gandalf has been terrible so far and lets not forget the horribly conceived infatuation between dwarf and elf. It's attempting to please tweens and people with short attention spans. Sorry, it's just not for me.

I think you're blaming everything you can in the series simply because you didn't like it.....

There is nothing wrong with the effects.

My only complaint, hobbit 2 seemed a bit rushed.

With that said, I can completely separate the movies from the books and not judge one based on the other.

Clearly, you don't understand the story.

Attention spans? Sorry, but these movies are anything but that. These movies have a very tight audience.

I would agree, however, Gandalf hasn't pulled his weight, yet.

Compare the Orcs in the original trilogy to the Orcs in the hobbit movies and say that again.

It's just lazy as shit to have a budget of this size and not use real effects.

Or, you are just used to the Lotr trilogy orcs since that art appeared first.

You're making assumptions regarding things you aren't sure about. You don't know what goes on in the studio or why decisions are made.

Probably one of the dumbest comments I've seen in months, thanks for the laugh man.

That's nice.

In the second page of this thread, you said you didn't care what people think. Clearly, you do care.

"Not caring what people think," is one of the most pretentious, cliche, childish phrase out there. I would reconsider not using it.

This post was edited by stupidkid282 on Jul 31 2014 11:55am