wait ricks hand was cut off in the comics?


are the comics worth reading?

and yah i dont think rick having 1 hand would be hard to do for the show... i mean look at the freaking zombies if they can do that they can do alot of shit

Yea that and the practicalities of rick performing basic tasks is difficult to show on camera, as opposed to the comics where he can just be drawn into any situation without the "how did he climb up there?" etc..

I still think there's a chance he will lose a hand

Rick is in way to many scenes to be doing cgi work to his body for every single scene.

merl had 1 hand and they did jsut find by it... idk how they make the show but if they wanted to remove ricks and i dont think cgi would be any problem or a reason not to do it


ur just talking our ur ass

This post was edited by MillerT1meUp on Mar 5 2015 05:49pm

I actually looked it up a long time ago. You are the one making assumptions. They added a device with a blade to avoid using cgi on merle. Merle was not in the comics so they could do whatever they wanted with him. Rick obviously was in the comics and just had a stump. A stump will require the removal of his hand by computers for every scene he is in. Maybe you should look into things instead of just making an ass out of yourself.

i wonder what the big catch is to this new place

it's that judith's sexual orientation hangs in the balance

LOL

sort of this.

if you watch episodes with merle sans hand you can kind of tell that he still does have one under the blade device thing due to the length of that arm being a fair bit longer than the arm with a hand.

oh yeah, that was way more hard to believe than the zombies being real xD