d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Entertainment Room > Movies & TV Shows > The Blacklist
Prev1363738394052Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 40,183
Joined: Apr 29 2006
Gold: 20,826.51
Mar 21 2015 07:38pm
Well, they got the court ruling they wanted, but at what price.

Who is the Attorney General Rep working for? I believe it is the faction that thinks Red has the Fulcrum [well thinks he does and doesn't].
With that said, are they trying to manipulate the Black site for their own benifit, by quashing the Court and making FBI Chief a pawn in
future endeavours. As for Red getting in Tom, good plan at the time, but, was it a manipulative play by others for Toms' return so that
they can use him to get to Red and Lizzies history and future?

I believe it is not going as Red wanted, and the others are making their moves by anticipating him, now that they know that Lizzy is Reds'
focus, but, they do not know whether Lizzy is key to the fulcrum or a major piece on the board used as a decoy.
Member
Posts: 27,042
Joined: Dec 30 2007
Gold: 4,966.59
Mar 27 2015 01:30am
Nice filler, they had to mix in the Keen and Red aspect into it, which was ok.

But that pos preview, I mean seriously...; dont miss the last 60 seconds :rofl:
Member
Posts: 179
Joined: Mar 17 2015
Gold: Locked
Mar 27 2015 06:28am
I loved it :P
Member
Posts: 32,925
Joined: Jul 23 2006
Gold: 3,804.50
Mar 27 2015 11:36pm
I'm confused. why did they put so much attention on hobbs early on? from what i saw from the FBI's perspective, there wasn't anything to suggest he was involved. more likely a rogue doctor performing experiments. yet they went after hobbs?
Member
Posts: 48,743
Joined: May 29 2012
Gold: 22,850.04
Mar 28 2015 05:34am
Quote (carteblanche @ Mar 28 2015 12:36am)
I'm confused. why did they put so much attention on hobbs early on? from what i saw from the FBI's perspective, there wasn't anything to suggest he was involved. more likely a rogue doctor performing experiments. yet they went after hobbs?


They thought, correctly, that he was the one actually behind it all
Member
Posts: 32,925
Joined: Jul 23 2006
Gold: 3,804.50
Mar 28 2015 10:00am
Quote (Flameyes @ Mar 28 2015 07:34am)
They thought, correctly, that he was the one actually behind it all


why did they think that? the only evidence i remember is that he owned the company the scientist worked in. the guy who shot the cop implicated the scientist, and the scientist never spoke to the FBI. we only know hobbs was involved because we saw things the FBI didn't.

and whether they were correct in hindsight doesn't impact the decisions as they're made.

This post was edited by carteblanche on Mar 28 2015 10:01am
Member
Posts: 27,042
Joined: Dec 30 2007
Gold: 4,966.59
Mar 28 2015 06:35pm
Quote (carteblanche @ Mar 28 2015 12:00pm)
why did they think that? the only evidence i remember is that he owned the company the scientist worked in. the guy who shot the cop implicated the scientist, and the scientist never spoke to the FBI. we only know hobbs was involved because we saw things the FBI didn't.

and whether they were correct in hindsight doesn't impact the decisions as they're made.


Hobbs, bigger fish. They always "try" to go after the bigger fish.
It's just the way it is.
Member
Posts: 48,743
Joined: May 29 2012
Gold: 22,850.04
Mar 28 2015 06:44pm
Quote (carteblanche @ Mar 28 2015 11:00am)
why did they think that? the only evidence i remember is that he owned the company the scientist worked in. the guy who shot the cop implicated the scientist, and the scientist never spoke to the FBI. we only know hobbs was involved because we saw things the FBI didn't.

and whether they were correct in hindsight doesn't impact the decisions as they're made.


it makes more sense to go after the higher ranking person

getting rid of the doctor won't stop the overall problem, just will temporarily slow it

stopping boss = stopping problem
Member
Posts: 27,042
Joined: Dec 30 2007
Gold: 4,966.59
Apr 3 2015 04:04am
Well, I wasn't expecting that finish.
Glad we're going to see more from Tom.

Also, April 23, said; new episodes return, you think "episodes" = 2 hour?

Also, happy some shows are skipping the GOT weekend.
And some shows are returning that same weekend, I feel bad for them.
Member
Posts: 2,266
Joined: May 27 2012
Gold: 24,725.00
Apr 3 2015 08:01am
Quote (James84 @ Apr 3 2015 03:04am)


Also, April 23, said; new episodes return, you think "episodes" = 2 hour?



lol, no

if wat u say is true, basically they're saying they have a break in between and will either run re-runs or something else during that timeslot and returning with new episodes starting apr 23

if they wanted to do a 2 hour finale, then they would outright say it

besides one 2 hour episode is still singular, not plural
Go Back To Movies & TV Shows Topic List
Prev1363738394052Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll