Quote (dirTyMan @ Sep 22 2013 10:30pm)
I see him as a good person. Wouldn't it be great to have some guy killing murderers and rapists instead of them getting out of prison or not even going to jail because someone messed up evidence , etc..
Even if I philosophically agreed with the idea of his "code" (which I don't), that's not enough to make us like him. His standards of evidence are extremely weak (he generally uses one break-in as enough evidence to convict his victims of his
permanent sentence... an archaic idea that our society broke away from with good reason). Weak enough that he actually killed innocent people before because of his screw-up for evidence gathering (a plot point that was actually addressed). Let's not forget that he kills tons of people outside the context of the code. For example, at the beginning of this season he stabbed some guy in the stomach who was - as far as he knew - just a jewel thief (no evidence of murder). He did it because their argument got a little heated and the guy seemed like he was about to use his fists. Okay... that's a reason to kill someone? ....... There are plenty more examples like that.
Anyway, the point is not so much whether or not he is a bad person (for some strange reason that's up for debate by some of the audience), but the fact that the writers seem to be clueless to the fact that he can be interpreted as such. They don't use it as a plot point for moral ambiguity. They constantly cast him as a knight in shining armor, in complete control of every situation he's ever in, and just straight up better at everything in every way than everyone around him. We're supposed to see him as this wonderful, amazing awesome guy, and everyone around him as just a bunch of stupid drones who don't know how awesome he is, and can never do anything nearly as well as he can. (It's also funny that a guy who trained in jiu jitsu a little when he was young - a martial arts form that's not nearly as useful on the streets as many others btw - seems to be able to win in just about every fight he's ever in.)
Quote (Textasy @ Sep 23 2013 06:03am)
And it made perfect sense. Death would be too easy punishment for Dexter, and so he exiles himself to a place where he is isolated, without anyone, any love, any dark passenger, nothing. It is how he feels he deserves to be because everyone he loves he hurts in some way or another, and the best way he knows how to protect them from himself is to disappear and punish himself by living in complete isolation. In the final scene, there is nothing but silence. No voice over, no anything. Just silence. And that is now Dexter's world. All he ever wished was to be human, and when he got his wish, he wished he didn't. He hated how it made him feel. Helpless.
This wasn't Dexter feeling helpless at all. As with the rest of the whole show, Dexter was in
complete control of every circumstance he falls into. He can kill whomever he wants and get away with it, and choose wherever he wants to go. He killed two people within, like, 10 minutes of each other, one that the entire Miami Homicide department actually saw!
This was Dexter facing the consequences on his own terms and by his own means, because the writers just feel that he's too awesome to face any real consequence that's out of his control. Basically, it was a cop out because some writer realized they have to make him suffer some sort of consequence or else the show would be completely dry, but they are still too in love with their main character to do anything too harsh. This ending just encompasses such a major part of what's wrong with this show... the stupidly unrealistic discrepancy between Dexter's capabilities and that of everyone else on the show.
This post was edited by AnomanderRake on Sep 23 2013 10:20am