Pretty sure they confirmed already that they are telling the documentary from one side only.

I live in Massachusetts and none of my family ( or myself ) knew anything about Stephen Avery and the events. I'm guessing it didn't make national news. He first trial was well before public use of the Internet and the second trial happened as social media was really only just beginning.

They're is a difference between telling one side and purposefully leaving out information (that helps the story) because it doesn't help the narrative you are trying to put together.

It is more mockumentary than documentary.

Watched episode one last night, very interesting.

This shit is really hard to watch.

The kid Brendan is such a moron, and his lawyer was never present when being interrogated. The police planted that whole confession

Thought it was an amazing docu. Wish it hadnt ended!

dindu nuffin

5/10

Avery definitely murdered that woman

on what merit?

Honestly, without looking at anything other than the documentary, no sane, and logical person could conclude he is guilty without doubt after watching that documentary.


Even the evidence not put in the documentary isn't concrete.

Worth the watch?
Hearing the hype around this series on netflix, might give it a try one of these nights.