rest of the world wouldnt launch nukes.. proof in the dark knight returns...... superman would still save the city causes he superman..

but still would get owned cause kryptonite...


batman fakes his death... world mourns superman

batman sips his tea while waiting for clone to appear.. and batman owns him too

end

Batman vs captain america would be cool but batman would win since he's too smart.
I think batman vs Ironman makes more sense

batman vs lelouch lamperouge
or
batman vs ender wiggin

Batman won't sacrifice people, he in turn wouldn't launch a nuke anyways. As is proof in dark knight rises. Your argument is invalid.

Yeah there are better options then Superman vs Batman, if they take the direction of it legitimately being 1vs1 fight then it's pretty dumb.

If it's like a competition or such thing like Batman or Superman being taken over in some way then I could live with it.

batman wouldnt be sacrificing people.. cause he knows superman would save them.. cause hes superman... so your point is invalid


and i doubt the movie will actually be batman VS superman...... prob will be them teaming up and fighting some great evil and having a friendly.. "i can do this better then you" moment and shaking hands respecting each others strength

Honestly I hope so. Even if I weren't a big Superman buff I couldn't see it even being fair if it were a fight. That's the dumbest thing ever. Batman struggles against non superpowered bad guys and superman struggles against Lex Luthor.
Plus it would be bad PR. "Let's release successful Batman movies and Superman movies then let's release one where they fight and we lose half our fan base"

Where the fuck was Superman when Bane was about to detonate a warhead in Gotham!?

i would have them fight darkseid

Fighting Zod in Metropolis bro.



Yeah would be the bad guy to choose. CGI budget going to kill them if that's the case though haha



This post was edited by Acuity on Apr 19 2014 02:05pm

what about apocalypse?