Quote (Blah58 @ Jan 4 2016 08:49pm)
There is so much information left out of the show, 6/10 for how completely biased it is. Instead of trying to make a real documentary they made this psuedo-doc bs.
Nearly all documentaries are biased in some way. They
usually all are telling specially one side of the story.
With that said, evidence or information left out still doesn't take away from the presented police investigation corruption, and sloppiness.
I haven't dug too deeply as to what "evidence" was left out, but I hear that the girl found him "creepy" which isn't evidence or a motive. Other things I have heard is questionable DNA found in her jeep, and verbal public threats from his first time in prison.
After watching the documentary, I still don't know if he is guilty or not, but I do know that he investigation was a disgrace to the justice system.
For those who are tuning in, Stephen Avery spent 17 years in prison for a rape he did not commit, proven not guilty by modern DNA tests. He was later convicted of rape and murder for a different individual and is now serving life in prison. This second conviction takes you through a case full of extremely questionable law enforcement actions and "evidence."