Quote (caezium @ 20 Dec 2014 00:34)
Quote (DeXaFiLaH @ 20 Dec 2014 00:59)
Between CL7 1600MHz RAM and CL8 1866MHz RAM, you gain at minimum 0.8 FPS and at maximum 2 FPS just based on your link from Watch Dogs alone. If you add MSAA to the mix, it goes to a 2.4 to 3 FPS jump.
Am I wrong, or did you just prove my point for me? Even the jump from CL 7 1600 to CL 10 2400 is 8 fps at best. You aren't going to notice 8 fps if you're already above 60 fps. If you're playing an FPS game on a 144 Hz panel and need that 8 FPS to stay above 144, sure, but other than that, it isn't really necessary.
I'm not saying don't buy it if its the same price, but the performance increase, again based on the article you linked, isn't going to be very noticeable.
Well I was compairing the 1600Mhz vs the 2400Mhz ones and I dont understand the text in the link provided but it looked like none was >60 so the better RAM seems to be a better/safer option
Made it simple and just checked: 2x4 DDR3 1600Mhz 7 CL 139 eur || 2400Mhz 11CL 133 euro.
Seems like buying the 2400 version wont hurt then? its even cheaper luls
Quote (DeXaFiLaH @ 19 Dec 2014 22:50)
You'll be fine with an 840 Evo as the SSD. You can also drop to the Extreme 4 motherboard if its significantly less expensive.
550w will be fine for a single gpu.
Finally, you wont notice much of a difference, if any, by going with faster RAM just gaming. Games arent really memory intensive, so you wont really benefit beyond 1600 MHz.
Yeah the 840 EVO already was in my crosshairs

Ill go with that one.. Saves me 45 euro..
Thanks for clearing up the psu question. Gonna keep that one then, good label and efficiency + modular
As for the motherboard, the extreme 4 is 50 € cheaper however if I keep the extreme 6 im entitled to a 30 € cashback in combo with my processor so this isnt worth it imo.
Thanks all for the input
