Well 1st off you edited your post.
2nd off 30Hz to 60Hz comparison doesn't count, because dropping below 60Hz DOES make a difference. Especially at grfx intense sections of games.
3rd, I was just kidding about the optic nerves.

/e Lastly, I've been to PC stores and seen 60Hz and 144Hz monitors showing game play footage, side by side. I truly can't see a difference, as long as v-sync is turned OFF.

This post was edited by Ghot on Aug 22 2015 09:02am

id go with the dell u2715h. the response time is great for an ips monitor. this is important for gaming. with an ah-ips panel, you can achieve darker blacks with good contrast. this is great for movies as well. with the factory calibration, your screen will be ready out of the box. the smaller bezels is a great improvement from the older generation. this will work to your advantage if you consider gaming on multiple screens.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824260234&cm_re=IPS_monitors-_-24-260-234-_-Product

Lol you didn't know hz and fps are related?

yes i did .

Why would you boast about 110 fps when you only really get60

we were talking about fps on a game and not monitor refresh rates in that context, i thought you meant that.

1st; i even mentioned in a later post i had edited that. It was like 30 seconds after i posted that i edited, and was at the time the newest post in the thread.

2nd; So you're saying that the human eye cant see above 60fps? Why wouldnt 30-60 matter? Its a slight exaggeration of the difference between 60-144.
3rd; hard to tell when you're joking, because you make some pretty wild claims sometimes lol

this is what im saying man

God damn, Read shit in context.

I'm saying the difference of 30-60fps could be considered a slight exaggeration of the difference between 60-144hz

That's NOT true.

Take this as proof. If I stand behind and umpire or a golfer teeing off, I can see the ball clear as day with no blurring.
However, if I stand to the side of said golfer or batter, I can definitely see blurring of the base ball or the golf ball.

My point is, I don't think the human eye COULD see the difference. If it could, then wouldn't I be able to see the base ball NOT blur from a side view.
In other words, I think the human eye itself has a limit to how fast it can process what it sees. If it didn't, then I should see no blurring on a 90mph pitch, when viewed from the side.

As to monitors, I have to believe that the same holds true. Sure you can make a monitor that will show a 144fps game at 144Hz refresh rate, but is the EYE even be able to tell the difference.



/e Take a hummingbird. There is no way ANYONE can SEE it's individual wing flaps...until slow motion is enabled. Unfortunately the human eye doesn't have a slow motion switch.

This post was edited by Ghot on Aug 22 2015 09:28am