d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Computers & IT > Computer Building > Opinions On This Build Please. > Is This A Good Deal?
Prev1456789Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 606Replies: 83Track Topic
Member
Posts: 9,646
Joined: Jan 2 2006
Gold: 15,151.00
#51
Feb 9 2010 02:05pm
Quote (decoppel @ Feb 9 2010 04:02pm)
The hilarious stupidity via you is priceless.

The equivalent to the $70 CPU I can buy now would have cost me 169.99 CANADIAN at that point and time, pre taxes.

it's now 69.99

So .... you know, I definitely got owned, right?

I definitely screwed up big time.


ok but ur singling out the cpu with that statement. if u want to consider the better motherboard, better graphics card, better ram and everything else u can too ur comptuer would of cost half. your looking at in unfairly.

This post was edited by Anilator(A) on Feb 9 2010 02:07pm
Member
Posts: 41,459
Joined: Aug 12 2005
Gold: 530.00
#52
Feb 9 2010 02:07pm
Quote (Anilator(A) @ Feb 9 2010 03:05pm)
ok but ur singling out the cpu with that statement. if u want to consider the better motherboard, better graphics card, better ram and everything else u can too ur comptuer would of cost half. you looking at in unfairly.


...

Just stop now.

The CPU IS THE BOTTLENECK THAT IS PREVENTING ME FROM ACHIEVING ADEQUATE PERFORMANCE.

I DON'T NEED ANY OTHER UPGRADES, BUT IF I DID MY PSU CAN SUPPORT IT, SO CAN MY MOBO.

x2 5200 + - 89.99 when I bought

240 - 69.99 ATM.

It would completely dissolve my CPU bottleneck, and at the time I bought the parts I did it was ADEQUATE.

Member
Posts: 9,646
Joined: Jan 2 2006
Gold: 15,151.00
#53
Feb 9 2010 02:11pm
Quote (decoppel @ Feb 9 2010 04:07pm)
...

Just stop now.

The CPU IS THE BOTTLENECK THAT IS PREVENTING ME FROM ACHIEVING ADEQUATE PERFORMANCE.

I DON'T NEED ANY OTHER UPGRADES, BUT IF I DID MY PSU CAN SUPPORT IT, SO CAN MY MOBO.

x2 5200 + - 89.99 when I bought

240 - 69.99 ATM.

It would completely dissolve my CPU bottleneck, and at the time I bought the parts I did it was ADEQUATE.


u mad? i m just letting u know that your logic is completly flawed. and computer hardware = time (since new shit comes out wut every 3 months?) so even though u can upgrade for 70. its been over time and all ur hardware has declined in value and the peformance ur gettin per dollar now isnt the same as when u first bought ur shit at higher prices. ur def wrong man ur being narrow minded. computers should never be built for "upgrades" u build em , u keep them until ur games dont run on high or medium settings anymore, then u overclock em to squeeze out all the performance you can. And then and only then do you build a WHOLE NEW SYSTEM. UNLESS of course you are a millionare like everyone on jsp and u cant play games unless its in quadfire with 150fps in crysis maxed out with 16x AA and AS

This post was edited by Anilator(A) on Feb 9 2010 02:12pm
Member
Posts: 41,459
Joined: Aug 12 2005
Gold: 530.00
#54
Feb 9 2010 02:14pm
Quote (Anilator(A) @ Feb 9 2010 03:11pm)
u mad? i m just letting u know that your logic is completly flawed. and computer hardware = time (since new shit comes out wut every 3 months?) so even though u can upgrade for 70. its been over time and all ur hardware has declined in value and the peformance ur gettin per dollar now isnt the same as when u first bought ur shit at higher prices. ur def wrong man ur being narrow minded. computers should never be built for "upgrades" u build em , u keep them until ur games dont run on high or medium settings anymore, then u overclock em to squeeze out all the performance you can. And then and only then do you build a WHOLE NEW SYSTEM. UNLESS of course you are a millionare like everyone on jsp and u cant play games unless its in quadfire with 150fps in crysis maxed out with 16x AA and AS


This is the most flawed logic I have ever seen before.

So I can upgrade my CPU now and instantly play everything I do at max settings, and not need to worry about another upgrade for a while, as opposed to having a non-upgradeable machine where I would have to scrap it all and drop another 600$ minimum.
Member
Posts: 16,893
Joined: Aug 25 2005
Gold: 8,601.26
#55
Feb 9 2010 02:14pm
Quote (Anilator(A) @ Feb 9 2010 04:11pm)
u mad? i m just letting u know that your logic is completly flawed. and computer hardware = time (since new shit comes out wut every 3 months?) so even though u can upgrade for 70. its been over time and all ur hardware has declined in value and the peformance ur gettin per dollar now isnt the same as when u first bought ur shit at higher prices. ur def wrong man ur being narrow minded. computers should never be built for "upgrades" u build em , u keep them until ur games dont run on high or medium settings anymore, then u overclock em to squeeze out all the performance you can. And then and only then do you build a WHOLE NEW SYSTEM. UNLESS of course you are a millionare like everyone on jsp and u cant play games unless its in quadfire with 150fps in crysis maxed out with 16x AA and AS


Your thinking is flawed.
Member
Posts: 9,646
Joined: Jan 2 2006
Gold: 15,151.00
#56
Feb 9 2010 02:15pm
Quote (decoppel @ Feb 9 2010 04:14pm)
This is the most flawed logic I have ever seen before.

So I can upgrade my CPU now and instantly play everything I do at max settings, and not need to worry about another upgrade for a while, as opposed to having a non-upgradeable machine where I would have to scrap it all and drop another 600$ minimum.


wow bro go back and read a few of my last post cause i already proved this statement wrong. here i ll copy and paste it in here for you.

Quote (Anilator(A) @ Feb 9 2010 04:00pm)
u were dumb to buy a inadiquate cpu in the first place then. u going cheap on the cpu to begin with was a waste of money and now the money u speent on the cpu initially is thrown out the window. GJ
Member
Posts: 16,893
Joined: Aug 25 2005
Gold: 8,601.26
#57
Feb 9 2010 02:17pm
Just to cut thru the spam.

Here is my build again/


[quote]

For 500-600 budget. It's hard to beat this rig. $576.12 after rebates, including shipping.

[quote]

Member
Posts: 41,459
Joined: Aug 12 2005
Gold: 530.00
#58
Feb 9 2010 02:17pm
Quote (Anilator(A) @ Feb 9 2010 03:15pm)
wow bro go back and read a few of my last post cause i already proved this statement wrong. here i ll copy and paste it in here for you.


O.K, let me prove you are an idiot once again.

CPU at the time - adequate.

CPU at the time 89.99

CPU to be adequate NOW (for my games) but using then pricing 169.99

CPU to be adequate NOW using NOW pricing - 69.99

169.99-159.98 = $10.01 in savings.

Plus, because of my future proofing next time I get too far behind on games I can just pop out my GPU or CPU and have all the games I need maxed again.

Member
Posts: 9,646
Joined: Jan 2 2006
Gold: 15,151.00
#59
Feb 9 2010 02:19pm
Quote (decoppel @ Feb 9 2010 04:17pm)
O.K, let me prove you are an idiot once again.

CPU at the time - adequate.

CPU at the time 89.99

CPU to be adequate NOW (for my games) but using then pricing 169.99

CPU to be adequate NOW using NOW pricing - 69.99

169.99-159.98 = $10.01 in savings.

Plus, because of my future proofing next time I get too far behind on games I can just pop out my GPU or CPU and have all the games I need maxed again.


what is this arguement a loop? got any new points?

Quote (Anilator(A) @ Feb 9 2010 04:05pm)
ok but ur singling out the cpu with that statement. if u want to consider the better motherboard, better graphics card, better ram and everything else u can too ur comptuer would of cost half. your looking at in unfairly.
Member
Posts: 41,459
Joined: Aug 12 2005
Gold: 530.00
#60
Feb 9 2010 02:19pm
Quote (Anilator(A) @ Feb 9 2010 03:19pm)
what is this arguement a loop? got any new points?


Got any real points?
Go Back To Computer Building Topic List
Prev1456789Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact