It's not bottlenecking if it's not at 100% usage... That word doesn't mean what you think it means.

lol you guys are funny keep arguing, its been proven lower resolution more ryzen doesnt compete hence my statement

and show games that dont use more than 4 cores lol

This post was edited by yupitsmeh on Jun 11 2017 11:24am

Nothing you posted showed Ryzen not competing. It showed it within like 5 fps? lol

My statement stands: have fun with thermal issues and spending 20% more for less than 10% more fps.

This post was edited by Incendiary on Jun 11 2017 11:24am

my statement stands 2600k still competes with ryzen

Cool have fun buying ancient hardware so you can remain an Intel fanboy just to prove a point. The rest of us will have fun playing games for much cheaper at much lower temperatures at the same fps. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

This post was edited by Incendiary on Jun 11 2017 11:26am

lol lower temps haha ryzen isnt lower temps either

You need to see a psychiatrist. You're clearly delusional.

Edit: Psychologist? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

This post was edited by Incendiary on Jun 11 2017 11:28am

My old phenom 9950 would compete with 4.5ghz 2600k with a slow enough gpu. All you can do is cling to your one link with one idiot benching one optimized shooter with a bunch of good cpu's and mid-tier gpu's that can hardly drop under 100% utilization even on a sandy bridge platform.







This post was edited by DCSS on Jun 11 2017 11:29am

Let him just keep fanboying and using flawed logic. It's like talking to a wall.

This post was edited by Incendiary on Jun 11 2017 11:30am

lol there is many ryzen reviews showing it loses the same in 1080p to 1440p, higher the resolution less cpu bottleneck thats why they test at lower resolutions lol
you and I know this
and my link was for him cuz he wanted something new because he thinks microcode update to get more variety of ram was going to increase performance

This post was edited by yupitsmeh on Jun 11 2017 11:32am