nothing will be added to the 1155 lineup... so your point on the am3+ socket is invalid
it would be seriously doubtful, seeing that there's people using 1366 and 1156 cpu's without getting bottlenecked...

Are you sure of that?
Could you provide any real benchmarks?
Of course 1-2 fps when they range about 30fps max wouldn't be that big of a difference but most of benchmarks deny that, with some expections on cpu heavy games like Civilization 5 i think and also Crysis 3 which uses FX power brilliantly

@up
Nothing will be added but the cpus already available are better in most of cases

people using 1366 don't get bottlenecked now but I haven't seen sli'ed Titans with i7-920 and I bet they would run much better at both fx or even more on 3570/2500 (beside the fact it could handle anything I think @ 60fps)

This post was edited by caezium on Apr 23 2013 04:25pm

http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=67132650&f=189&p=450264959

EDIT: @ Dolar - Proper grammar was used in that post.

This post was edited by VVR4ITH on Apr 23 2013 04:31pm

benchmarks are perfect and ideal settings.. No one in the world lives in perfeect benchmark settings...

I'm sure.. and this is 1-2 when im sitting @ 60 fps... they drop up and down between both @ 58-60 on different games.. i think the lowest I've seen my 3570k go is 41 on bf3 and my 8350 went to 38 on bf3

I mean't own fraps benchmarks, bf3 runs almost the same on both i5 and fx

So wait.. a cpu demanding game.. runs the same on a 8350/8320 as it does a 3570k... but the 3570k is sooooo much better why?

i5 3570k is better in other games...

and the 8350 is better than the i5 in other games too...

What an incredible work of art... those lines are so amazingly painted. How long did it take you to paint this masterpiece? I feel that if your painting was around a long long time ago.. it would be the inspiration behind The Mona Lisa.