Intel Fanboy posts garbage that quickly gets obliterated, vanishes and never comes back....

Thanks JSP for restoring my faith in humanity

ITT: kid uses UserBenchmark for this comparison X_X

I think it's a good site for comparing relative performance of chips in the same product line like i5-4440 vs i5-4690k but yeah. Doesn't seem to optimize the workload for different architectures. IMO this is one of the reason Ryzen's scores suffer on this site. It doesn't seem to take advantage of the expansive cache AMD packs on the chip relative to Intel. The only accurate comparisons you get when looking at Ryzen on this site is when you compare them to each other.

To further highlight how random and nebulous that "effective speed" meter that OP is using to denigrate ryzen: look at these results and tell me how the 1700 is only 43% faster



This post was edited by DCSS on May 22 2017 07:32am

(4+18+108)/ 3

point is its obviously not only 43% better
on this site to be 100% better you need at least the same number of cores and twice the single core. Or, ridiculously, 66% more single core and twice the cores!

What?

This post was edited by DCSS on May 22 2017 07:58am

user benchmark is shit

Lol well said bunch of number crunchers

Come on man... Lol
As in get the cheapest R5 instead..

Fixed