Quote (Deny @ Feb 20 2016 07:30pm)

that PSU is junk. Cheap caps and prone to failures. $1200 build with a garbage PSU.

Quote (Booyaka @ Feb 20 2016 09:27pm)

[URL=https://pcpartpicker.com/parts/partlist/]https://pcpartpicker.com/parts/partlist/[/URL]

Total: $1199.60


if you wait for 1st week of march during march madness u will save around 100-200$ and u can add windows 7 and couple fans to this build


i

Quote (Fr3nChi @ Feb 20 2016 10:43pm)

WTF are you talking about, this PSU is way more then enough and reliable for this build. It has 4.23/5 user review rating on Newegg out of 292 reviews...
For a $1200 build, that is good enough for a PSU. Plz stop talking out of your ass.

However, I did find a deal on a better 650W PSU Gold+ certified and Fully modular. Also you can add 100W for $10 but you don't need it. (Only $2 more)
http://pcpartpicker.com/p/BmMh4D
Total: $1189.22 without MIR
Total: $1164.22 with MIR

Quote (Secksii @ Feb 21 2016 12:36am)

[URL=http://pcpartpicker.com/p/7T47f7]http://pcpartpicker.com/p/7T47f7[/URL]
Base Total: $1144.47
Mail-in Rebates: -$60.00
Total: $1084.47

can get 750/850w b2 psu to save more $$$, but the 850w p2 is an absolute steal at that price after MIR.
10yr warranty, superflower oem, evga gfg support, enough power to use for future systems so wont need to purchase another psu later on

u can also fit a i7 6700k in a 1.2k build if you're going to make use of hyperthreading.



he's not wrong tho, especially for a 1.2k build.
Why ever cheap out on the power supply? especially when it needs to power a 390x and OC potential, CX wouldnt be ideal for that when there are better options out there nowadays.. as it's not 2009 anymore.

i wouldn't use newegg reviews as a reference.. cos u might as well recommend this really kewl raidmax blue psu since it's 4/5 based on 1300+ newegg reviews
[URL=http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817152028]http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817152028[/URL]
and we all know how shitty raidmax psus are (hopefully)

Quote (maulepan @ Feb 21 2016 01:06am)

I already posted it in a different topic, but i simply want to make sure that josh87 has the right information:
[URL=http://www.anandtech.com/show/7763/an-update-to-kingston-ssdnow-v300-a-switch-to-slower-micron-nand]http://www.anandtech.com/show/7763/an-update-to-kingston-ssdnow-v300-a-switch-to-slower-micron-nand[/URL]
The Kingston SSD is cheap for a reason.

Quote (Fr3nChi @ Feb 21 2016 11:24am)

but if he grabs 2 like I said and runs it in Raid 0, it should outperform the Evo in Reads by close to double

Quote (maulepan @ Feb 21 2016 02:40am)

Dad math skills. 2*170MB/S > 502MB/S ????

Quote (maulepan @ Feb 21 2016 02:49am)

Thats the old revision. That why i posted the article (did you even read it??). The Specs are from when the SSD came out. Kingston swtiched suppliers and is now using a cheaper NAND which not only delivers as low as 170MB/S.
In Germany some of the cards are even listed with the current speeds of 190MB per second read and 140MB per second write
[URL=https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&tl=en&u=http://www.mindfactory.de/product_info.php/240GB-Kingston-SSDNow-V300-2-5Zoll--6-4cm--SATA-6Gb-s-MLC-asynchron--SV30_829975.html]https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&tl=en&u=http://www.mindfactory.de/product_info.php/240GB-Kingston-SSDNow-V300-2-5Zoll--6-4cm--SATA-6Gb-s-MLC-asynchron--SV30_829975.html[/URL]